My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/13/2012
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
03/13/2012
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/29/2016 1:37:40 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:13:42 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
SWDD
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/13/2012
Meeting Body
Solid Waste Disposal Board
Archived Roll/Disk#
4053
Book and Page
142, 213-218
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that the Selection Committee, with input from Kessler Consulting, had recommended as the most <br /> qualified and financially beneficial response to the RFP , ReCommunity ' s dual- stream recycling <br /> proposal . <br /> MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Davis, <br /> SECONDED by Chairman Wheeler, to approve staff' s <br /> recommendation. <br /> Todd Westover, Republic Services, observed that single-stream recycling is the trend for <br /> the future . He thereafter introduced Republic ' s General Manager, Mark Talbott, and Senior <br /> Vice President of Government Affairs , Bob Healy , <br /> Mr. Talbott used a PowerPoint presentation (copy on file) to provide an overview of the <br /> benefits of single -stream recycling and to highlight what Republic Services could offer the County in <br /> terms of revenue and environmental sustainability . <br /> Director Mehta commented that staff would be reevaluating the single- stream recycling <br /> in 2015 and affirmed that ReCommunity is the best financial proposal for the County at this <br /> time . He added that ReCommunity has the ability to offer single- stream if the County decides to <br /> change its program in the future . <br /> County Administrator Joseph Baird noted that the SWDD budget had to have increases <br /> this fiscal year, and that the County needs to secure the best deal for the taxpayers . <br /> March 13 , 2012 3 BuKA <br /> 142 PG 215 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.