My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
03/22/2011
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
03/22/2011
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2016 11:06:52 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:03:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
03/22/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4048
Book and Page
140, 633-677
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
i <br /> Attorney Polackwich clarified that one criterion could be the basis of denial , and advised <br /> the Board to make as broad a Motion as possible, should there be a legal challenge . <br /> Commissioner Flescher clarified his Motion, stating that after reviewing the evidence , he <br /> had concluded that there would be an adverse impact on the public health, safety, and general <br /> welfare of the citizens of Indian River County , <br /> Commissioner Davis conveyed that his issue was with the compatibility of the A- 1 Walee <br /> facility with the surrounding land uses . However, he believed that the recycling facility could <br /> have merit in the right location, such as the County ' s landfill . <br /> Chairman Solari felt that the facility would not promote orderly development, and asked <br /> whether Commissioner Flescher wanted to include that in his Motion . <br /> MOTION WAS AMENDED by Commissioner Flescher, <br /> SECONDED by Vice Chairman Wheeler, to include the <br /> findings that by substantial , competent evidence, the <br /> granting of the special exception would adversely impact <br /> the public health, safety, and general welfare ; and the <br /> application would not promote orderly and efficient <br /> development of the area. <br /> A brief discussion ensued wherein Commissioners Davis , O ' Bryan, and Wheeler <br /> provided explanations on why they felt the facility is NOT compatible with the surrounding land <br /> uses . <br /> Attorney Polackwich, responding to the Board ' s remarks , clarified what elements should <br /> be included in the Motion . <br /> March 22 , 2011 30 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.