My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08/21/2012 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2012
>
08/21/2012 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/1/2016 10:26:48 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:17:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
08/21/2012
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4055 - CD
Book and Page
142, 783-843
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
62
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
stipulate a timeframe of 15 years for the successor <br /> developers to complete the sidewalk improvements . <br /> The Chairman CALLED THE QUESTION, and the final <br /> amended Motion carried unanimously. The Board : ( 1 ) <br /> approved the substitution of acceptable security from the <br /> successor developers, based upon inclusion of a <br /> stipulation in the deed restriction that the required <br /> sidewalk improvements at Citrus Springs Village G and <br /> Serenoa Phase 1 must be constructed before the projects <br /> receive the Certificate of Occupancy, AND within the <br /> timeframe of 15 years, with the deed restriction becoming <br /> null and void upon completion of the sidewalks ; and (2) <br /> directed PNC Financial Services and the new developers <br /> to seek approval from the lot owners in Citrus Springs <br /> Village G and Serenoa Phase 1 whose properties have not <br /> been acquired by PNC , to agree to said deed restriction. <br /> 13. D. NOTICE OFINTENT TO SELL SURPLUS STATE LAND — INDMNRivER <br /> CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION <br /> Attorney DeBraal provided background and analysis regarding the State ' s intention to <br /> sell surplus land at the site of the former Indian River Correctional Institution, consisting of <br /> approximately 99 acres adjacent to Interstate 95 . He advised that the County had a 40-day <br /> window in which to act, and recommended that the Board obtain the required appraisal and then <br /> render a decision on whether or not to purchase the subject property. <br /> Attorney Polackwich explained that the State allows educational institutions, State <br /> agencies, and counties to bid on the land before the public . He told Board members that they <br /> would not be making a decision on whether to purchase the land today, but on whether they <br /> . . . 4 ns 142 PG 838 <br /> August 21 , 2012 39 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.