My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/13/2011 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/13/2011 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2018 8:59:38 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:08:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/13/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4050
Book and Page
141, 350-392
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
that one year period, the entitlement to a refund, under our Code, is waived. Since no one filed <br />an application, and the funds are still sitting there, Asset Research and Recovery, Inc. would like <br />the Board to open a new refund application period so people can receive back those funds. <br />Attorney Polackwich stated that the current intended purpose of the funds in Fund 101 is <br />th <br />for an intersection expansion project at the intersection of 17Street and State Road AlA. He <br />specified that this project is located in the City, the County would pay for the project with the <br />impact fees from Fund 101, and based on Ordinance 99-14, the funds held in Fund 101 are <br />required to be spent on original TIF fee District 2. He suggested that if the Board wants to make <br />refunds, that it direct staff to analyze the issues thoroughly, clarify direction with the Attorney <br />General, and come up with proposals and alternatives. <br />Chairman Solari addressed the Fund 101 issue first, then the administrative issues of the <br />fee and notice. <br />Charlie Wilson, 1057 6th Avenue, Asset Research and Recovery, Inc., presented his <br />interpretation and offered suggestions on: (1) the impact fee refund; (2) the 17th Street <br />improvement project; (3) the separation of interest and principal of accounting; and (4) using an <br />accurate list for notice. <br />A brief discussion ensued regarding how the impact fee would be paid. <br />The Chairman called a break at 1:01 p. m., and reconvened the meeting at 2:1 S p. m. with <br />all members present except Commissioner Davis, who returned at 2:18 p.m. <br />(Clerk's Note: After reconvening, the Chairman announced that Item 13.A. would be <br />continued following Item 12.D.1.) <br />September 13, 2011 26 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.