My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/13/2011 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/13/2011 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/11/2018 8:59:38 AM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:08:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/13/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4050
Book and Page
141, 350-392
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Charlie Wilson briefly reviewed his comments from the morning session and pointed out <br />that since 400 to 600 people did not make application/claim for the refund, it should be obvious <br />that they did not know, which means the Statute of Limitations should have started when the <br />people and County were advised that the fund existed. He reiterated that Fund 101 should be <br />viewed separately from all other issues, stressed that refunding the money or expanding the 17th <br />Street project should not bean either/or decision. He requested the Board return the Fund 101 <br />money and establish a task force to oversee the refund process. <br />Commissioner Davis was concerned about a future refund procedure, and the issue of <br />who would be eligible to apply and receive the refunds. He wanted "unneeded" impact fees to <br />be refunded but was uncertain how it should be accomplished, and who should receive the <br />refunds. <br />Mr. Wilson provided recommendations. <br />Chairman Solari felt the refunds should go back to the people. He said if an orderly <br />refund mechanism could be established, he would vote for it. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan believed: (1) traffic counts should be reevaluated to see if the <br />demand is still there, (2) staff should obtain formal clarification from the City of Vero Beach as <br />to what they plan to do, (3) staff should follow Ordinance 1986-14 which states unused fees are <br />to be paid back with interest, and (4) the County Attorney should obtain an opinion from the <br />Florida Attorney General to reaffirm that the County falls within the Wildwood refund law <br />ruling. <br />Director Brown provided status on the current road projects and the committed funds <br />within the districts. <br />Vice Chairman Wheeler wanted to know where the County can legally use the money. <br />September 13, 2011 27 <br />PG 388 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.