My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/6/2011 (8)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2010's
>
2011
>
09/6/2011 (8)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/26/2016 12:26:18 PM
Creation date
9/25/2015 5:07:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/06/2011
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
4050
Book and Page
141, 282-325
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the adoption of the proposed ordinance, and if so , offer suggestions and comments . She also <br /> requested the Board authorize advertising for a Public Hearing to consider final adoption . <br /> Attorney Polackwich acknowledged that there are five secondary recyclers in the County, <br /> and that all had been provided Notice . <br /> Attorney Odom addressed questions and concerns from the Board . <br /> Sheriff Deryl Loar urged the Board to adopt the proposed ordinance at the Public <br /> Hearing . He pointed out that the current crime trends throughout the State for copper, brass , and <br /> aluminum being traded with secondary recyclers, has been overwhelming. <br /> James Harpring, General Counsel , Sheriff' s Office, said the ordinance would be an <br /> important tool for the Sheriff' s Office, and did not think it would impede any lawful businesses . <br /> A brief discussion ensued regarding the current laws and restrictions , and regulated <br /> metals . <br /> Attorney Polackwich clarified that the State Law states that if any secondary metal is sold <br /> in a transaction of $ 1 , 000 or more, the seller cannot be paid in cash, whereby the proposed <br /> ordinance would tighten the loop hole in the State law, and not allow cash transactions . <br /> Shannon Cook, Indian River Scrap Metal , explained why he did not support the <br /> proposed ordinance ; defined his company ' s policies and procedures ; and said he had no <br /> problems issuing a check to his customers for regulated metals , but expressed concerns about <br /> mailing their checks . He spoke about the process, the information required from his customers, <br /> and the security used (driver ' s licenses , video cameras , how everything is saved, thumb printed, <br /> identified, and signed for) when purchasing regulated metals . He believed that everything <br /> required for restricted/regulated items was already in place and that the requirement would be <br /> "one more form of documentation . " He said that at the end of every workday he could/would <br /> September 6 , 2011 24 U4 ! PG 3 18 <br /> Un <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.