My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-136
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:15:01 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
06/10/2003
Control Number
2003-136
Agenda Item Number
11.G.1.
Entity Name
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Subject
Grant Awards - DEP Agreement No. 0061
Archived Roll/Disk#
3161
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3270
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ATTACHMENT G <br /> QUALITY ASSURANCE REQUIREMENTS FOR DEP AGREEMENTS <br /> 1 . All sampling and analyses performed under this Contract must conform to the requirements set forth in Chapter 62- 160, <br /> Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.) and the document "Requirements for Field and Analytical Work performed for <br /> the Department of Environmental Protection under Contract" (DEP-QA-002/02), February 2002 . <br /> 2 , LABORATORIES <br /> A. The Contractor shall ensure that all laboratory testing activities are performed by a laboratory certified by the <br /> Department of Health Environmental Laboratory Certification Program (DoH ELCP) for the test methods and <br /> analytes to be measured. <br /> B . If the laboratory is not certified for some or all of the proposed test measurements, the laboratory shall apply for <br /> certification within one month of Contract execution, and shall be fully certified within six months . Regardless of <br /> when the laboratory receives certification, the laboratory must implement all applicable standards of the National <br /> Environmental Laboratory Accreditation Conference (NELAC) upon Contract execution. <br /> C. Prior to providing analytical services, the laboratory must provide information for all test measurements that at <br /> least one set of performance test samples that meet the DoH ELCP certification requirements have been passed <br /> successfully within the last 6 months . <br /> D . Laboratories shall maintain certification for all test methods during the life of the Contract. Should certification for <br /> an analyte or test method be lost, all affected tests shall be immediately contracted to a laboratory with current <br /> DoH ELCP certification. The laboratory shall notify the project manager in writing of any changes before such <br /> changes are made . <br /> E . A copy of the DoH Certificate and the list of test methods for each laboratory shall be provided to the <br /> project <br /> manager with submission of the QAPP or upon receiving DoH certification (see 2 .13 above). <br /> F. All non-standard laboratory procedures (i.e. those that do not appear on the Department' s list of recognized <br /> methods) whether DoH ELCP certification is required or not, shall be submitted for review and approval in <br /> accordance with DEP-QA-001 /01 , "New and Alternative Analytical Laboratory Methods", January 1 , 2002 . The <br /> method must be approved by the Department before use . <br /> G. The Contractor shall ensure that the essential quality control measures, laboratory report content and <br /> documentation are consistent with Chapter 5 of the NELAC standards and DEP-QA-002/02 . In addition: <br /> 1 . The final concentration of any spike fortification must be at the laboratory ' s stated PQL or at the action level if <br /> it exceeds the PQL. If the measured sample background exceeds the specified spike level by more than a <br /> factor of two, then the spike level must be 2-5 times the measured background level in the sample that is <br /> selected for spiking. If a spiked sample is spiked at an incorrect level, then the entire batch of samples must be <br /> re-prepared, a new aliquot of the same sample must be re-spiked at the correct level for this batch, and the <br /> batch reanalyzed. The sample to be spiked should be randomly selected, and it must be reported which sample <br /> was spiked. All spike fortification must take place prior to any necessary preparation. The results must meet <br /> the established laboratory acceptance criteria for the specific matrix. If none have been developed, the <br /> laboratory shall use the criteria for LCS until such limits are established. <br /> 2 . No analyses may be performed using expired reagents, calibration solutions or check solutions . <br /> 3 . The concentration of each calibration standard used to generate a nonlinear calibration curve must <br />be <br /> calculated based on the curve. All calculated calibration concentrations must be within 85 % - 115% of the <br /> known concentration for that standard. <br /> 4. If a relative response factor is used to determine the sample concentration, the continuing calibration checks <br /> must meet the method stated acceptance criteria. <br /> 5 . Analytical sensitivity must be evaluated using a check standard prepared at the practical quantitation limit for <br /> each analytical run as described above for PQLs . <br /> DEP Agreement No. G0061 , Attachment G, Page 1 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.