My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-136
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-136
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/17/2016 4:15:01 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:35:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
06/10/2003
Control Number
2003-136
Agenda Item Number
11.G.1.
Entity Name
State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection
Subject
Grant Awards - DEP Agreement No. 0061
Archived Roll/Disk#
3161
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3270
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
40
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
6. The absolute value of the raw instrument value must be less than the MDL for all blanks . <br /> 7 . If method control limits for any measurements are exceeded (including control limits for sample matrix <br /> spikes), then the analysis must be repeated if possible. All sample data that is associated with a failed quality <br /> control measure must be appropriately qualified as specified in Chapter 62- 160, F.A.C. An explanatory <br /> comment must be attached to the final report for each result that has a qualifier code other than U, I, or A. <br /> Any additional qualifier codes used, but not explicitly provided for in Chapter 62- 160, F.A. C. , must be <br /> identified and defined in the report. <br /> 8 . The reported MDL and PQL for each sample must be adjusted for dilution factors and any <br /> relevant <br /> preparation weights and volumes . <br /> 9 . If a field blank, equipment blank or trip blank result is greater than the MDL, the result must be confirmed by <br /> reanalyzing a new aliquot of the sample . The laboratory must investigate sufficiently to determine that <br /> positive blank results are not due to a laboratory error, and report results with appropriate qualifiers and/or <br /> comments . <br /> 3 . FIELD ACTIVITIES <br /> A. All sample collection and field activities shall be performed in accordance with the Department ' s "Standard <br /> Operating Procedures for Field Activities" (DEP-SOP-001 /01 dated January 1 , 2002 . <br /> B . Any non-standard field procedure shall be submitted for review and approval in accordance with FA 2000 of the <br /> Department ' s Standard Operating Procedures . The procedure must be approved by the Department before use . <br /> 4. REPORTING, DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS RETENTION <br /> A. All laboratory and field records as specified in Chapter 62 - 160, F .A. C., shall be retained for a minimum of five <br /> years after the project completion. <br /> B . In addition to the NELAC-compliant laboratory report, the Contractor shall require that the laboratory provide <br /> additional information to satisfy the "Tier 1 " validation requirements as outlined in DEP-QA-002/02 . <br /> C. All applicable data qualifier codes as mandated by Chapter 62- 160, F.A. C . , and included in DEP-QA-002/02 shall <br /> be used. <br /> D . The Contractor shall adhere to the documentation and records requirements for project data contained in DEP-QA- <br /> 002/02 . <br /> E. All field and laboratory records that are associated with work performed under this contract shall be organized so <br /> that any information can be quickly and easily retrieved. <br /> 5 . AUDITS <br /> A. AUDITS BY THE DEPARTMENT — Pursuant to 62- 160. 650, F.A. C., the Department may conduct audits of field and/or <br /> laboratory activities. In addition to allowing Department representatives to conduct onsite audits, the Contractor, <br /> upon request, must provide the Department with the requested information, including the raw analytical data for all <br /> analyses of a sample (regardless of whether the data are reported) . If an audit by the Department determines that <br /> the data are not usable for the proposed purpose, the Department reserves the right to terminate the contract and <br /> require the Contractor to reimburse the Department for all payments made for work done on the collection or <br /> analysis of data. <br /> B . PLANNING REVIEW AUDITS — <br /> 1 . Initial: Within one month after the second sampling and analysis event has been completed (including all <br /> analyses), the Contractor and all associated subcontractors shall review the planning document (see 6 below) <br /> relative to the field and laboratory activities to determine if the data quality objectives are being met, identify <br /> any improvements to be made to the process, and refine the sampling design or schedule. A summary of the <br /> review, including any corrective action plans or amendments to the planning document shall be sent to the <br /> DEP Agreement No. G0061 , Attachment G, Page 2 of 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.