My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-020
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-020
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/18/2016 9:07:34 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 12:13:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
01/17/2006
Control Number
2006-020
Agenda Item Number
7.P.
Entity Name
State Of Florida Department of Transportation
Subject
bike path-right of way
Area
Fellsmere Road
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7172
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
31
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
TYPE 1 AND PROGRAMMATIC CATEGORICAL EXCLUSION CHECKLIST <br /> Financial Project No . 416 — FA No . <br /> Project Description : S ( DeWk . iN F�ovetS Alf0 <br /> YES NO V <br /> v _ Are the impacts to local traffic patterns, property access, community cohesiveness, <br /> planned community growth or land use patterns not adverse? <br /> ✓ Are all air, noise and water quality impacts negligible or non-existent? <br /> to/ _ If there is wetland involvement, does it qualify for either Nationwide or General <br /> P ermit? <br /> ✓ _ Can the project proceed without a U.S . Coast Guard Permit? <br /> f� Are any or all floodplain encroachments not significant in accordance with Part 2, <br /> Chapter 24? <br /> _ Will endangered and threatened species and their critical habitats remain unaffected? <br /> �✓ _ Is there no right-of-way or an insignificant amount of right-of-way required for the <br /> project? <br /> Are the residential or business relocations for the project not significant? <br /> J _ Is Section 4(f) not applicable to the project? <br /> Have properties protected under Section 106 which are taken, used or in close <br /> proximity to the project been identified and if applicable reviewed by SHPO, and has <br /> a determination of "No Effect" or "No Adverse Effect' been given? <br /> Is the Contamination involvement not significant? <br /> A/ _ The project does not require a public hearing or an opportunity for a public hearing? <br /> IMPORTANT If the answer to any of these questions is No, then a Type 1 or Programmatic <br /> Categorical exclusion does not apply. <br /> Figure 3 . 2 Type I and Programmatic Categorical Exclusion Checklist (continued) <br /> 01 - 12-04 PART 1 , CHAPTER 3 28 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.