Laserfiche WebLink
Application to OWNER or return the Application to <br />CONTRACTOR indicating in writing ENGINEER's <br />reasons for refusing to recommend payment. In the <br />latter case, CONTRACTOR may make the necessary <br />corrections and resubmit the Application. <br />2.ENGINEER's recommendation of any payment <br />requested in an Application for Payment will constitute a <br />representation by ENGINEER to OWNER, based on <br />ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the executed <br />Work as an experienced and qualified design <br />professional and on ENGINEER's review of the Appli- <br />cation for Payment and the accompanying data and <br />schedules, that to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, <br />information and belief: <br />a. the Work has progressed to the point <br />indicated; <br />b. the quality of the Work is generally in accor- <br />dance with the Contract Documents (subject to an <br />evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior <br />to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of <br />any subsequent tests called for in the Contract <br />Documents, to a final determination of quantities <br />and classifications for Unit Price Work under <br />paragraph 9.08, and to any other qualifications <br />slated in the recommendation); and <br />c. the conditions precedent to <br />CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such payment <br />appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is <br />ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the Work. <br />3. By recommending any such payment ENGI- <br />NEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented <br />that: (i) inspections made to check the quality or the <br />quantity of the Work as it has been performed have <br />been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of the Work <br />in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work <br />beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to <br />ENGINEER in the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there <br />may not be other matters or issues between the parties <br />that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally <br />by OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to <br />CONTRACTOR. <br />4.Neither ENGINEER's review of <br />CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of recom- <br />mending payments nor ENGINEER's recommendation <br />of any payment, including final payment, will impose <br />responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or <br />control the Work or for the means, methods, techniques, <br />sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety <br />precautions and programs incident thereto, or for CON- <br />TRACTOR's failure to comply with Laws and Regu- <br />lations applicable to CONTRACTOR's performance of <br />the Work. Additionally, said review or recommendation <br />will not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make <br />any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes <br />CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid on account <br />of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of <br />the Work, materials, or equipment has passed to <br />OWNER free and clear of any Liens. <br />5.ENGINEER may refuse to recommend the whole <br />or any part of any payment if, in ENGINEER's opinion, it <br />would be incorrect to make the representations to <br />OWNER referred to in paragraph 14.02.B.2. ENGI- <br />NEER may also refuse to recommend any such pay- <br />ment or, because of subsequently discovered evidence <br />or the results of subsequent inspections or tests, revise <br />or revoke any such payment recommendation <br />previously made, to such extent as may be necessary in <br />ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from loss <br />because: <br />a. the Work is defective, or completed Work <br />has been damaged, requiring correction or replace- <br />ment; <br />b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br />Written Amendment or Change Orders: <br />c. OWNER has been required to correct <br />defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br />with paragraph 13.09; or <br />d. ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br />occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br />paragraph 15.02.A. <br />C. Payment Becomes Due <br />1.Ten days after presentation of the Application for <br />Payment to OWNER with ENGINEER's recommenda- <br />tion, the amount recommended will (subject to the <br />provisions of paragraph 14.020) become due, and <br />when due will be paid by OWNER to CONTRACTOR. <br />D. Reduction in Payment <br />1.0WNER may refuse to make payment of the full <br />amount recommended by ENGINEER because: <br />a. claims have been made against OWNER <br />on account of CONTRACTOR's performance or fur- <br />nishing of the Work; <br />b. Liens have been fled in connection with the <br />Work, except where CONTRACTOR has delivered <br />a specific Bond satisfactory to OWNER to secure <br />the satisfaction and discharge of such Liens; <br />c. there are other items entitling OWNER to a <br />set -of against the amount recommended; or <br />d. OWNER has actual knowledge of the occur- <br />rence of any of the events enumerated in para- <br />graphs 14.02.B.5.a through 14.02.B.5.c or para- <br />graph 15.02.A. <br />2 -If OWNER refuses to make payment of the full <br />amount recommended by ENGINEER, OWNER must <br />give CONTRACTOR immediate written notice (with a <br />copy to ENGINEER) stating the reasons for such action <br />and promptly pay CONTRACTOR any amount <br />remaining after deduction of the amount so withheld. <br />OWNER shall promptly pay CONTRACTOR the <br />amount so withheld, or any adjustment thereto agreed <br />to by OWNER and CONTRACTOR, when CONTRAC- <br />00700 General Conditions (E1CDC).doc <br />00700-31 <br />1907-039 121nch WM - Vero Lake atates` DocumrntsV epodstaidding Contract Speciticatlons100700 General Conditions (UCDC).doc <br />