Laserfiche WebLink
Application to OWNER or return the Application to 5. ENGINEER may refuse to recommend the whole <br /> CONTRACTOR indicating in writing ENGINEER's or any part of any payment if, in ENGINEER's opinion, it <br /> reasons for refusing to recommend payment. In the would be incorrect to make the representations to <br /> latter case, CONTRACTOR may make the necessary OWNER referred to in paragraph 14 .02.B.2. ENGI- <br /> corrections and resubmit the Application- NEER may also refuse to recommend any such pay- <br /> ment or, because of subsequently discovered evidence <br /> 2. ENGINEER's recommendation of any payment or the results of subsequent inspections or tests, revise <br /> requested in an Application for Payment will constitute a or revoke any such payment recommendation <br /> representation by ENGINEER to OWNER, based on previously made, to such extent as may be necessary in <br /> ENGINEER's observations on the Site of the executed ENGINEER's opinion to protect OWNER from loss <br /> Work as an experienced and qualified design because: <br /> professional and on ENGINEER's review of the Appli- <br /> cation for Payment and the accompanying data and a. the Work is defective, or completed Work <br /> schedules, that to the best of ENGINEER's knowledge, has been damaged, requiring correction or replace- <br /> information and belief: ment; <br /> a. the Work has progressed to the point b. the Contract Price has been reduced by <br /> indicated ; Written Amendment or Change Orders: <br /> b. the quality of the Work is generally in accor- c. OWNER has been required to correct <br /> dance with the Contract Documents (subject to an defective Work or complete Work in accordance <br /> evaluation of the Work as a functioning whole prior with paragraph 13 .09; or <br /> to or upon Substantial Completion, to the results of <br /> any subsequent tests called for in the Contract ., d . ENGINEER has actual knowledge of the <br /> Documents, to a final determination of quantities occurrence of any of the events enumerated in <br /> and classifications for Unit Price Work under paragraph 15.02.A. <br /> paragraph 9.08, and to any other qualifications <br /> slated in the recommendation); and C. Payment Becomes Due <br /> c. the conditions precedent to 1 .Ten days after presentation of the Application for <br /> CONTRACTOR's being entitled to such payment Payment to OWNER with ENGINEER's recommenda- <br /> appear to have been fulfilled in so far as it is tion, the amount recommended will (subject to the <br /> ENGINEER's responsibility to observe the Work. provisions of paragraph 14.020) become due, and <br /> when due will be paid by OWNER to CONTRACTOR . <br /> 3. By recommending any such payment ENGI- <br /> NEER will not thereby be deemed to have represented D. Reduction in Payment <br /> that: (i) inspections made to check the quality or the <br /> quantity of the Work as it has been performed have 1 .0WNER may refuse to make payment of the full <br /> been exhaustive, extended to every aspect of the Work amount recommended by ENGINEER because: <br /> in progress, or involved detailed inspections of the Work <br /> beyond the responsibilities specifically assigned to a . claims have been made against OWNER <br /> ENGINEER in the Contract Documents; or (ii) that there on account of CONTRACTOR's performance or fur- <br /> may not be other matters or issues between the parties nishing of the Work; <br /> that might entitle CONTRACTOR to be paid additionally <br /> by OWNER or entitle OWNER to withhold payment to b. Liens have been fled in connection with the <br /> CONTRACTOR. Work, except where CONTRACTOR has delivered <br /> a specific Bond satisfactory to OWNER to secure <br /> 4. Neither ENGINEER's review of the satisfaction and discharge of such Liens ; <br /> CONTRACTOR's Work for the purposes of recom- <br /> mending payments nor ENGINEER's recommendation c. there are other items entitling OWNER to a <br /> of any payment, including final payment, will impose set-off against the amount recommended; or <br /> responsibility on ENGINEER to supervise, direct, or <br /> control the Work or for the means, methods, techniques, d . OWNER has actual knowledge of the occur- <br /> sequences, or procedures of construction, or the safety rence of any of the events enumerated in para- <br /> precautions and programs incident thereto, or for CON- graphs 14.02.B .5.a through 14 .02.B.5.c or para- <br /> TRACTOR's failure to comply with Laws and Regu- graph 15.02.A. <br /> lations applicable to CONTRACTOR's performance of <br /> the Work. Additionally, said review or recommendation 2- If OWNER refuses to make payment of the full <br /> will not impose responsibility on ENGINEER to make amount recommended by ENGINEER, OWNER must <br /> any examination to ascertain how or for what purposes give CONTRACTOR immediate written notice (with a <br /> CONTRACTOR has used the moneys paid on account copy to ENGINEER) stating the reasons for such action <br /> of the Contract Price, or to determine that title to any of and promptly pay CONTRACTOR any amount <br /> the Work, materials, or equipment has passed to remaining after deduction of the amount so withheld. <br /> OWNER free and clear of any Liens. OWNER shall promptly pay CONTRACTOR the <br /> amount so withheld , or any adjustment thereto agreed <br /> to by OWNER and CONTRACTOR, when CONTRAC- <br /> 00700 General Conditions (EICDC).doc <br /> 00700 - 31 <br /> 1907-039 121nch WM - Vero Lake atates` DocumrntsV epodsteidding Contract Speciticatlons100700 General Conditions (UCDC).doc <br />