My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-086
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-086
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/4/2016 12:07:22 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 3:24:16 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Work Order
Approved Date
03/24/2009
Control Number
2009-086
Agenda Item Number
12.I.1
Entity Name
Coastal Technology Corporation
Subject
Sector 3 Beach and Dune Restoration Work Order No.4
Area
Sector 3 Beach
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
10539
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Conference Report <br /> March 11 , 2009 <br /> Page 2 of 2 <br /> Based upon the characterization of the "minimum specs " described by Bob , it was determined that there is a <br /> potential for none of the upland sand sources to qualify for the Sector 3 project since upland sand source material <br /> tends to be finer grain than offshore source material . <br /> Permitting <br /> Lois Edwards asked for a time frame relative to the Department review clock once a request was submitted. Bob <br /> indicated that Department review is typically 21 days from the initial request and then 14 days for review of <br /> subsequent revisions . It was concluded that there would be an approximately 60 to 75 day delay strictly relative <br /> to permit processing when accounting for 1 RAI and response. The Department confirmed that an additional <br /> UMAM assessment will also be required if the characteristics of the upland sand do not result in a "no impact" <br /> project design. <br /> Lois asked if the request would be considered a permit modification. Merrie Beth indicated that until the pernut is <br /> issued it would only be a revision to the project description. <br /> The Department stated that if an upland source was selected there would be modifications to the Sediment <br /> QA/QC Plan to include inspection of each truck and stockpile of "washed" material (if needed) . <br /> Other Department Comments/Concerns <br /> Bob indicated that the Department would be concerned with the use of upland material in the region from R20 to <br /> R30 because of the seaward horizontal berm feature and use of potentially finer grain material . Bob also <br /> indicated that regions in the southern portion of the Sector 3 project area may be deemed suitable for the use of <br /> upland material based on minimal fill densities but it could pose contractual problems during the bidding phase . <br /> Bob also noted that if the County was going to vary from use of the offshore borrow area characteristics, the <br /> County will need to advise the Department if the redesign of the beach fill area has potential for an adverse effect <br /> on nearshore resources . Bob noted that the design objective was to meet a certain performance criteria with no <br /> impact to nearshore resources . Bob also indicated that the EA will basically have to be rewritten in an upland <br /> sand source is used. <br /> Meme Beth indicated that additional information would need to be provided relative to upland access points , <br /> staging areas used for stockpiling, and dune plant protection measures . <br /> James Gray concluded the telephone conference by identifying that it was not the County ' s intent to delay the <br /> processing of the project as currently proposed and that this conversation was an informal discussion. James said <br /> that the County will continue to process the JCP application as originally submitted at this time. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.