Laserfiche WebLink
The revised 2002 SWIM Plan reiterates these strategies and names the IRFWCD sub-basin as a priority non-point <br /> source project in the IRL Basin. <br /> This project is the first regional effort to reduce pollutant loads and freshwater discharges to the Indian River <br /> Lagoon from the IRFWCD . An interim goal of 50% reduction of nutrient and suspended solids has been adopted <br /> by all involved parties (Indian River County, IRL Program ( SJRWMD) , IRFWCD, City of Vero Beach) until Total <br /> Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) or Pollutant Load Reduction Goals (PLRGs) are formally established (FSD-3 ) . <br /> This project will implement a new BMP for stormwater management (FSD-4) and this treatment system is an <br /> agricultural BMP . As part of the East Indian River County Master Storinwater Management Plan (Master Plan), <br /> this project will help complete a comprehensive drainage basin map of the IRL (FSD-5 ) . The environmental <br /> education element will inform residents of Indian River County and particularly the citrus growers, about managed <br /> stormwater treatment systems, and the potential for pollutant removal in the IRFWCD basin (FSD- 11 ) . Since the <br /> IRFWCD is a Florida Statutes Section 298 drainage district, this project will assist in reducing discharges from <br /> this large-scale drainage system to the IRL (FSD- 12) . Indian River County will fund operation of this system. <br /> (FSD- 14) . <br /> Additionally, as part of the master planning process, verification of existing pollutant loads and new loading <br /> calculations will be completed (IRL- 1 - 104-D) . Monitoring of the water quality in the canals has already been <br /> completed to some extent by IRFWCD and additional monitoring is planned in this project (IRL- 1 - 101 -D) . This <br /> project will identify and quantify the nonpoint source problem in this area of the IRFWCD , and provide control <br /> (IRL-3 - 107-D) . <br /> ESTIMATED POLLUTANT LOAD REDUCTION : <br /> The typical challenge in estimating pollutant load reductions is first obtaining an accurate estimate of the pollutant <br /> loads from the watershed. These loads are influenced by land use distribution and management practices . Models <br /> that estimate the pollutant loads apply coefficients for the various land conditions, land practices and <br /> their <br /> distribution. This can be done for the Indian River County project. However, 46 years of water quality data does <br /> exist for the Indian River Farms canal system. This averaged data, coupled with recent specific field monitoring, <br /> provides a more accurate representation of the expected pollutant loadings to the project site . Reducing these <br /> loadings by well-established BMP treatment efficiencies will provide a relatively accurate estimate of the project' s <br /> pollutant load reduction. <br /> According to IRLNEP(b) ( 1994), the total discharge from the IRFWCD is 148 cfs on a mean annual basis . This <br /> equates to 96 million gallons/day (MGD) . The Main Relief Canal drainage basin contributes approximately 50% <br /> of the flow on average (48 MGD) . The proposed Egret Marsh project anticipates a withdrawal from a point below <br /> a control structure that regulates flow from the Lateral C Canal that flows into the Main Relief Canal. This 9,000- <br /> acre sub-basin contributes half of the Main Canal ' s flow, or 24 MGD . <br /> The proposed Egret Marsh treatment system is designed to handle an average flow of 10 MGD . Based on this <br /> average daily withdrawal from the Lateral C canal and the average concentrations of selected pollutants, the <br /> annual loading rate can be established for this project as follows : <br /> Annual Loadings Based on Average Withdrawal of 10 MGD, Average Canal Water Quality at the Lateral <br /> C Canal Radial Gate - Based on IRFWCD and County Data <br /> Constituent Lateral C Canal Annual Load lbs. <br /> TSS 16 . 0 m L 4877056 <br /> TN 1 . 59 m L 48 ,401 <br /> TP 0 . 52 m L 15 , 829 <br /> A treatment-train approach using multiple Best Management Practices (BMP) is recommended for this site . The <br /> flow of canal water will pass first through a pre-treatment pond and then through an Algal Turf Scrubber® <br /> (ATSTM) system. While some biological activity will occur in the pre-treatment wet pond, the primary purpose of <br /> the pond is to capture suspended solids and floatables at the head of the treatment system. A method <br /> for <br /> determining the removal efficiency of suspended solids in wet ponds presented in Wanielista and Yousef ( 1993) <br /> was used to predict the pre-treatment pond performance given different flow rates . A portion of total nitrogen and <br /> total phosphorous load, which is associated with suspended solids will also be removed. From Wanielista and <br /> DEP Agreement No. G0143, Attachment A, Page 2 of 9 <br />