Laserfiche WebLink
Yousef ( 1993 ) it is assumed that 25 % of the total nitrogen is associated with suspended material, and 40% of the <br /> total phosphorous is associated with the suspended material . The following table presents the results of efficiency <br /> calculations using these assumptions . <br /> Pre-Treatment Pond Estimated Removal Efficiencies <br /> Flow Rate TSS removal TN removal TP removal <br /> 10.0 MGD 62% 15 % 25 % <br /> The second BMP in the treatment train is a managed aquatic plant system (MAPS) . This is a proven technology <br /> currently being used in Okeechobee for a South Florida Water Management District ( SFWMD) project <br /> (Okeechobee S- 154 Managed Aquatic Plants System Water Treatment Facility) . That project, designed and <br /> operated by HydroMentia, Inc . , employs a MAPS that is a combination Water Hyacinth Scrubber (WHSTM) and <br /> algal turf scrubber system (ATSTM) . Recent testing of this system shows that water with nutrient concentrations <br /> similar to those in the IRFWCD can be treated to a high level just using an ATSTM without using a WHSTM . Based <br /> on the SFWMD ' s system' s performance, a six-acre ATSTM is capable of treating 10 MGD . The ATS contributes <br /> significantly to the overall continuous treatment efficiency of the treatment-train system. Results from the <br /> SFWMD project are incorporated into the estimated ATSTM removal efficiencies below: <br /> Algal Turf Scrubber ATS System Estimated Removal Efficiencies <br /> Flow Rate TSS Removal TN Removal TP Removal <br /> 10 MGD 80% 75 % 63 % <br /> The third BMP is a polishing pond. The polishing pond will offer some water quality improvements, but they are <br /> small compared to the high quality of treatment provided by the ATSTM . However, the polishing pond will provide <br /> an important ecological benefit and storage for water potentially needed by other users . It also allows any algal <br /> material that escapes from the ATSTM to be collected before final discharge. <br /> Finally, a small demonstration passive wetland polishing system will be provided. This tertiary treatment system <br /> will receive part of the treated flow discharging from the polishing pond. Through plant uptake and settling, the <br /> wetland polishing system will remove suspended solids and much of the dissolved nutrients that escape the <br /> polishing pond. The wetlands will be a valuable ecological enhancement and an important educational component <br /> and they will demonstrate that high quality wetlands may be established when they are properly loaded from a <br /> nutrient perspective . These wetlands will provide a needed habitat and refuge for the birds, amphibians, insects, <br /> and animals that the park will attract. They will become a valuable wildlife refuge and nature <br /> facility, <br /> demonstrating a successful effort to recreate this area ' s original ecosystem. <br /> Using the treatment efficiencies presented for each element of the treatment train (excluding the polishing wetland <br /> since it will not treat the entire design flow), the combined overall treatment efficiency of the system can <br />be <br /> estimated: <br /> Overall Pollutant Removal Efficiencies for Egret Marsh <br /> Flow Rate TSS Removal TN Removal TP Removal <br /> 10 MGD 92% 78 % 72 % <br /> Resulting Annual Loads of Pollutants Removed lbs. er ear <br /> INNEMENEW 448 ,091 1 37 ,753 11 ,397 <br /> The significance of these removal rates are realized when they are compared with the total loadings from the <br /> IRFWCD ' s 50,000+ acre basin and the basin ' s proposed load reduction goals : <br /> The Treatment System' s Removal Efficiencies Compared With IRFWCD ' s Total Loadings and the <br /> Corresponding Load Reduction Goals Established by the Master Plan <br /> Description Percent TSS Percent TN Percent TP <br /> Removed Removed Removed <br /> IRFWCD Basin ' s total loading 1 ) 7 % 10% 17% <br /> Proposed Load Reduction Goal 2 ) 12 % 20% 35 % <br /> ( 1 ) The total yearly loadings from the IRFWCD are : TSS = 6, 167 ,733 pounds/year, TN = 385 , 596 pounds/year, <br /> and TP = 66,380 pounds/year. [ 1995 draft SWIM program as listed on page 86 of the Master Plan. ] <br /> DEP Agreement No. G0143 , Attachment A, Page 3 of 9 <br />