Laserfiche WebLink
be collected at least once during the project and at least annually thereafter . The GRANTEE <br /> shall specify the procedure for splitting the samples in the planning document. <br /> ( 1 ) The results from the two laboratories shall be assessed using a precision criterion of no <br /> greater than 20 % RPD as an initial guide to assessment of the split sample results . <br /> (2 ) All differences between split sample results from the two laboratories shall be <br /> investigated and resolved . <br /> 4 . REPORTING , DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS RETENTION <br /> a . The GRANTEE shall ensure that all laboratory and field records as outlined in Rules 62- 160 .240 <br /> and . 340 , F .A. C . are retained for a minimum of five years after the project completion . <br /> b . All field and laboratory records that are associated with work performed under this Agreement <br /> shall be organized so that any information can be quickly and easily retrieved for inspection , <br /> copying or distribution . <br /> C. The GRANTEE shall ensure that all laboratory reports are issued in accordance with NELAC <br /> requirements . These reports shall be submitted to the DEP project manager and shall include the <br /> following information : <br /> ► Laboratory sample identification ( ID ) and associated Field ID <br /> ► Analytical/test method <br /> ► Parameter/analyte name <br /> ► Analytical result ( including dilution factor) <br /> ► Result unit <br /> ► Applicable DEP Qualifiers per Table 1 of Chapter 62- 160 , F .A. C . <br /> ► Result comment(s ) to include corrective/preventive actions taken for any failed QC <br /> measure (e . g . , QC sample , calibration failure , etc. ) or other problem related to the <br /> analysis of the samples <br /> ► Date and time of sample preparation ( if applicable) <br /> ► Date and time of sample analysis <br /> ► Results of laboratory verification of field preservation <br /> ► Sample matrix <br /> ► DoH ELCP certification number for each laboratory (must be associated with the test <br /> result(s ) generated by the laboratory) <br /> ► MDL <br /> ► PQL <br /> ► Sample type (such as blank type , duplicate type , etc . ) <br /> ► Field and laboratory QC blank results : <br /> • Laboratory QC blank analysis results as required by the method , NELAC Chapter <br /> 5 and the planning document (see Section 6 below); <br /> • Field quality control results including trip blanks , field blanks , equipment blanks , <br /> and field duplicates (or replicates ) as specified in the planning document (see <br /> Section 6 ) <br /> ► Results of sample matrix spikes , laboratory duplicates or matrix spike duplicates , as <br /> applicable <br /> ► Results of surrogate spike analyses ( if performed ) <br /> ► Results of laboratory control samples ( LCS ) <br /> ► Link between each reported quality control measure (e . g . , QC blanks , matrix spikes , <br /> LCS , duplicates , calibration failure , etc . ) and the associated sample result(s ) <br /> ► Acceptance criteria used to evaluate each reported quality control measure <br /> d . The GRANTEE shall ensure that the following field-related information is reported to the DEP <br /> project manager : <br /> ► Site and/or facility name , address and phone number <br /> ► Field ID for each sample container and the associated analytes (test methods ) for which <br /> the container was collected <br /> ► Date and time of sample collection <br /> ► Sample collection depth <br /> ► Sample collection method identified by the DEP SOP number, where applicable <br /> ► If performed , indicate samples that were filtered <br /> Revised 3/05 <br /> DEP Agreement No . G0143 , Attachment H , Page 3 of 11 <br />