Laserfiche WebLink
► Field test measurement results : <br /> • DEP SOP number ( FT-series ) , where applicable <br /> • Parameter name <br /> • Result <br /> • Result unit <br /> • Applicable Data Qualifiers per Table 1 of Chapter 62- 160 , F .A. C . <br /> ► Narrative comments discussing corrective/preventive actions taken for any failed QC <br /> measure (e . g . , blank contamination , meter calibration failure, split sample results , etc . ) , <br /> unacceptable field measurement or other problems related to the sampling event. <br /> e . The Department reserves the right to request some or all of the laboratory or field information in <br /> an electronic format. <br /> 5 . AUDITS <br /> a . AUDITS BY THE DEPARTMENT — Pursuant to Rule 62- 160 . 650 , F .A. C . , the Department may conduct <br /> audits of field and/or laboratory activities . In addition to allowing Department representatives to <br /> conduct onsite audits , the GRANTEE , upon request by the Department, must provide all field and <br /> laboratory records pertinent to the contracted field and laboratory activities . If an audit by the <br /> Department results in a determination that the reported data are not usable for the purpose(s) or <br /> do not meet the data quality objectives specified by the Agreement, the DEP project manager <br /> shall pursue remedies available to the Department , including those outlined in Section 8 below. <br /> b . PLANNING REVIEW AUDITS — <br /> ( i ) Initial : Prior to the completion of the sampling and analysis events and as specified in <br /> Addendum 1 , the GRANTEE and all associated subcontractors shall review the planning <br /> document (see Section 6 below) relative to the completed field and laboratory activities to <br /> determine if the data quality objectives are being met, identify any improvements to be made <br /> to the process , and refine the sampling and/or analytical design or schedule . Within one <br /> month of the review, a summary of the review, including any corrective action plans or <br /> amendments to the planning document, shall be sent to the DEP project manager and a copy <br /> shall be maintained with the permanent project records . <br /> ( ii ) Ongoing : Planning reviews as described in item ( i ) above shall occur annually . <br /> C, QUALITY SYSTEMS AUDITS — The GRANTEE and all subcontractors shall ensure that any required <br /> laboratory and field quality system and management systems audits are performed according to <br /> the respective Quality Manuals for each contracted and sub-contracted entity. These audits shall <br /> be documented in the GRANTEE 's and subcontractors ' records . <br /> d . STATEMENTS OF USABILITY — As a part of the audit process and the final report , the GRANTEE <br /> shall provide statements about data usability relative to the Agreement Data Quality Objectives <br /> and Data Quality Indicators specified in the planning document, this attachment and the addenda . <br /> ( i ) The GRANTEE shall ensure that all acceptance and usability criteria required by this <br /> Agreement not specified above are listed in the planning document . <br /> ( ii ) The GRANTEE shall ensure that the results of all quality control measures described above <br /> are evaluated according to the acceptance criteria listed in this attachment , the addenda and <br /> the planning document . <br /> ( iii ) The GRANTEE shall ensure that all sample results are evaluated according to the additional <br /> usability criteria specified in the planning document . <br /> 6 . PLANNING DOCUMENT <br /> a . The GRANTEE shall submit the planning document identified below to the DEP project manager <br /> no later than 120 days prior to the commencement of field and laboratory activities . Failure to <br /> submit the planning document in this required timeframe shall result in a delay of approval to <br /> begin work until the document has been submitted to the Department and approved by the DEP <br /> project manager. The document shall be submitted as a Quality Assurance Project Plan (QAPP) . <br /> The plan shall be consistent with the EPA Document EPA-QA/R-5 , EPA Requirements for Quality <br /> Assurance Project Plans , dated March 2001 . <br /> b . The GRANTEE and subcontractors may submit a version of the planning document to the <br /> Department for approval no more than three times . If the GRANTEE fails to obtain approval for <br /> Revised 3/05 <br /> DEP Agreement No . GO 143 , Attachment H, Page 4 of 11 <br />