My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-169a
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Interlocal Agreement
Approved Date
05/17/2005
Control Number
2005-169A
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver
Subject
Impact Fee Study Interlocal Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4919
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Credit Component <br /> Table IV - 7 provides a summary of revenue sources used to fund capital additions and <br /> replacements , as well as operations . As presented , the two largest funding sources are the <br /> service assessment and the construction and demolition debris disposal charges . In Table <br /> IV - 7 , the average revenue figures over the past six years along with their percentage of <br /> the total revenues are shown . Total revenues available for SWDD capital and operating <br /> expenditures average approximately $ 10 . 8 million per year, while operating expenditures <br /> average $ 8 . 8 million per year, leaving an average of $ 2 . 0 million per year for capital <br /> expenditures . It should be noted that the operating expenditures of the District have been <br /> increasing, which has been reducing the amount of funding available for capital <br /> expenditures . While the percentage of revenues available for capital expenditures (total <br /> revenues less operating costs) in relation to total revenues averaged approximately 18 . 6 <br /> percent over the past six years , no revenues were budgeted for capital expenditures in FY <br /> 04/05 , which indicates a policy decision of reducing capital purchases funded with the <br /> District ' s revenues . <br /> In addition , the County has been reducing the assessment fee rate and , as a policy , is <br /> interested in further reductions . This combination of reducing the assessment fee rate <br /> along with increasing operating expenses is likely to further reduce the funding available <br /> for capital expenditures . This reduction makes it necessary for the County to explore <br /> other funding sources, such as solid waste impact fees . New growth, which will pay <br /> impact fees , will also benefit from lower assessment fees . <br /> Finally, Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) regulations require that <br /> the owner or operator of a solid waste management facility establish escrow accounts , or <br /> alternative financial mechanisms , during the useful life of the facility to accumulate funds <br /> for its eventual closure and long -term care . Annual closure account balances are <br /> required , each of which is to equal an annually revised estimated total closure amount <br /> times the percentage of the landfill capacity that is consumed at the end of the respective <br /> accounting period . According to IRC representatives , the SWDD currently has a fund <br /> balance of $30 million to comply with FDEP regulations , and the County needs to retain <br /> or increase this balance in the future . It is important to note that this fund balance is not <br /> an unreserved fund balance . A portion of it must be set aside or reserved for future cell <br /> closures and long term maintenance to comply with FDEP regulations . <br /> Tindale -Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 IV- 13 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.