My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-169a
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-169a
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/19/2016 11:11:28 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 8:44:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Interlocal Agreement
Approved Date
05/17/2005
Control Number
2005-169A
Agenda Item Number
9.A.1
Entity Name
Tindale-Oliver
Subject
Impact Fee Study Interlocal Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
4919
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Imposing a solid waste facilities impact fee serves a two-fold purpose . First, it enables <br /> the County to retain , or possibly reduce , the current assessment fee , while generating <br /> sufficient dollars to accommodate the needs of the existing and new population . Second , <br /> it allows the County to accumulate the necessary fund balance to comply with FDEP <br /> regulations . <br /> To illustrate this point, it is assumed that the assessment fee rate will remain at FY 04/05 <br /> levels upon the adoption of the impact fee . As shown in Table IV- 8 , the County reduced <br /> assessment fee rates by an average of one percent per year over a seven -year period . <br /> Keeping the assessment fee rates at current levels over the next 15 years actually results <br /> in a reduction of the fees in terms of real dollars when inflation is taken into <br /> consideration . The study objective is that imposing impact fees will result in the County <br /> not having to increase its assessment fee rates , while still allowing it to carry the <br /> necessary fund balance required to meet FDEP regulations . <br /> Table IV =8 <br /> Changes in the Assessment Fee Rates ( ' ) <br /> Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Fiscal Year Adopted FY <br /> Rates 1998/99 1999/2000 2000/01 2001/02 12002/03 2003/04;' 2004105 Average <br /> Residential <br /> Per Waste Generation Unit (WGU) $48 . 23 $47. 56 $47 . 56 $47. 56 $47. 56 $47.45 $46 . 86 <br /> Percent Chane - 1 .4% 0 . 0% 0.0% 0.0% -0.2% - 1 . 2% -0 . 5 % <br /> Per Equivalent Residential Unit (ERU) $77. 17 $76. 10 $76 . 10 $76. 10 $76. 10 $75 .92 $74.98 <br /> Percent Chane - 1 .4% 0.0% 0. 0% 0.0% -0. 2% - 1 .2% -0. 5 % <br /> Commercial <br /> Per Waste Generation Unit (WGU) 1 $34 .45 $33 . 70 1 $33 . 70 1 $33 .70 1 $32 .58 1 $32 . 53 $31 .89 <br /> Percent Change 1 -2 . 2%1 0. 0%1 0.0% -3 . 3 % -0.20, <br /> ( 1 ) Source : Office of Management and Budget, IRC <br /> In addition, it is assumed that 15 percent of all revenues will be dedicated for capital <br /> expansion of the Solid Waste Program . As shown in Table IV - 7 , the revenues available <br /> to fund capital ranged from 18 . 2 percent of total revenues in FY 99/00 to 26 . 8 percent in <br /> FY 00/01 , with an average of 18 . 6 percent from FY 99/00 to FY 04/05 . In addition , the <br /> County did not budget any District revenues for capital expenditures in FY 04/05 . To be <br /> conservative , however, this analysis assumes that 15 percent of all District revenues will <br /> be allocated to the capital expansion projects , and this percentage will be used to <br /> calculate the impact fee credit . <br /> (This space intentionally left blank) <br /> Tindale-Oliver & Associates , Inc . Indian River County <br /> May 2005 IV- 15 Impact Fee Study <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.