My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-323A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-323A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 1:36:04 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 12:58:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Certificate
Approved Date
12/15/2009
Control Number
2009-323A
Agenda Item Number
8.D.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Dredged Material Exhibit B
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7963
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
distribution curves and/or Atterberg limits ; and suspended sediment-settling time curves representing the <br /> finest-grained sample from each boring location . <br /> The recommended inlet operation strategy, based on the sediment data presented above, reflects a <br /> poorly graded mix of fine sand and silt-sized particles . This strategy makes no attempt to segregate material <br /> grain-size fractions by inlet manipulation, although some segregation will occur naturally as a result of <br /> differential settling behavioras described above . To minimize the mounding ofthe coarsest sediment fraction <br /> and to distribute the deposited material more uniformly, the inlet pipeline should be repositioned during <br /> dredging operations. This will require extending the pipeline and resting each extension on the sediment <br /> mound formed at the previous position. A minimum distance of 100 ft must be maintained between the inlet <br /> and the inside toe of the dike to preclude erosion or undercutting the interior dike slope. This strategy will <br /> also reduce the concentration of the finest sediment nearest the weirs as each deposition mound captures a <br /> portion of the silt- sized particles. (With a fixed discharge position , these particles would continually wash <br /> from the mound . ) The resulting deposition pattern should maintain a consistent slope from inlet to weir, <br /> should minimize dead zones and channelization, and should reduce the requirement for grading the deposited <br /> material to reestablish the desired 0 . 2% slope between successive dredging operations . <br /> 3. 2. 1 Monitoring Related to Inlet Operation <br /> During active dredging operations, several monitoring procedures related to inlet operations will be <br /> required . Ponding depth , as previously mentioned , is a critical parameter for maintaining acceptable <br /> containment basin performance. Increased ponding depth improves the basin 's solids retention performance <br /> by increasing retention time. However, under saturated foundation conditions, unbalanced hydrostatic forces <br /> resulting from too great a ponding depth can lead to slope instability, slumping, and the potential for dike <br /> failure. Indications of impending dike instability" include evidence of seepage related to piping and <br /> foundation saturation at the outer dike toe and small-scale slumping. Obviously, such conditions must be <br /> avoided. Therefore, ponding depth should be increased above the 2-ft minimum mean depth only under close <br /> monitoring by visual inspection of dike integrity. As discussed in Section 2 .2.2 , a 2-ft mean ponding depth <br /> corresponds to a 2 . 8-ft depth at the weirs as a result of the initial slope of the basin interior. If no effluent <br /> is released at the weir, the output of an 18- in . dredge (i . e. , 3 , 560 cy/hr slurry at a 20/80 solids/liquid mix, or <br /> 2,848 cy/hr liquid) will produce an increase in ponding depth of about 2 . 1 in ./hr and a rise in the water <br /> 29 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.