My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-323A
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-323A
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2016 1:36:04 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 12:58:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Certificate
Approved Date
12/15/2009
Control Number
2009-323A
Agenda Item Number
8.D.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Dredged Material Exhibit B
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
7963
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
remaining weir boards must be set according to the installation guidelines presented in Section 2 . 3 . 2 . In <br /> addition, as also discussed in Section 2 . 3 . 2, the contractor must use weir boards fabricated from nominal <br /> 6x6 timbers (5 . 5 in. x 5 . 5 in. finished dimensions) for the lowermost 4 R of each weir stack. <br /> As dredging progresses and the level of ponded water approaches the initial weir crest elevation, <br /> the contractor must determine whether to begin the release of effluent . This decision must reflect the <br /> results of turbidity testing of the upper 2 ft of the ponded water immediately upstream of the weirs . A <br /> depth of 2 ft represents the estimated maximum depth of withdrawal, that is, the depth of the surface layer <br /> released over the weirs . <br /> 3. 3. 2 Maximum Ponding Depths and Required Inspections <br /> If testing determines that the ponded surface water at the weirs fails to meet permit requirements, <br /> the contractor must provide additional retention time, either by raising the weir crest elevation or shutting <br /> down the dredge until sufficient settling has occurred . If the contractor chooses to raise the weir crest by <br /> adding additional weir boards, he must proceed with caution. Experience has shown that increasing the <br /> water level too quickly or maintaining an excessive ponding depth can lead to excessive seepage through <br /> the dike, a condition that increases the potential for slope instability and, under extreme circumstances, <br /> dike failure. <br /> Considerations of dike safety require that mean ponding depths at the IR- 14 containment facility <br /> must not exceed 5 ft without notification and approval of the Project Engineer. Even with all required <br /> approvals, the contractor must not exceed the 5 -ft maximum, even to meet required effluent standards, <br /> without instituting a significantly more rigorous program of dike inspection. Chapter 4.0 outlines the <br /> basic requirements for the dike inspection program as well as the critical conditions that would trigger <br /> more intensive inspections. Inspections , conducted at least once a week under normal conditions, must <br /> increase to at least once a day immediately upon discovery of a critical condition. However, increasing <br /> the ponding depth (as measured at the weirs) beyond the recommended 5-ft operational maximum <br /> requires that the contractor further increase the inspection frequency and provide close, continual <br /> inspection of the entire dike perimeter at all times while ponding depths remain greater than the <br /> recommended 5-ft maximum. All dike inspections must be performed by a qualified geotechnical <br /> engineer or engineering technician experienced in the inspection of earthen dams, reservoirs, or dredged <br /> material containment facilities . As part of the required preconstruction submittals, the contractor must <br /> provide the qualifications of all designated inspectors to the Project Engineer for review and approval . <br /> - 16 - <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.