My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
quality by a factor of 1 . 33 , and provides a margin of safety to ensure that the clarified supernatant released <br /> from the IR- 14 containment basin will meet state water quality standards . Therefore, the IR- 14 containment <br /> basin requires a 4 . 0- ft mean operational ponding depth . <br /> However, care must be taken not to increase ponding depth above the 2 .0- ft minimum too quickly . <br /> This may lead to dike saturation and promote dike instability. Operational experience has demonstrated that <br /> dike permeability typically reduces with time as percolation filters and traps fine sediments . Thus , a <br /> sufficiently slow increase in ponding depth will avoid piping, slumping, and other indicators of dike <br /> saturation and instability . Restricting the operational ponding depth to 4 ft should also reduce the likelihood <br /> of dike instability and provide an appropriate safety factor to ensure adequate solids removal . <br /> Consideration of realistic field conditions further reinforce the IR- 14 containment basin ' s <br /> conservative design . First, DMRP research indicates that under typical field conditions the actual depth of <br /> withdrawal may be significantly less than the WES Selective Withdrawal Model predicts . Solids retention <br /> should improve with decreased withdrawal depth . Second , field conditions may reduce dredge discharge <br /> rates below the design criterion . The design dredge discharge (3 , 560 cy/hr) reflects a minimum separation <br /> between the dredge plant and the placement site and thus a minimum discharge line length . Increasing the <br /> discharge line length also increases frictional losses and correspondingly reduces dredge discharge and <br /> extends basin retention time . The maximum pumping distance for Site IR- 14 to serve the extreme southern <br /> end of Reach III is 4 . 47 miles . Thus, actual dredge discharge rates will likely fall well below the design <br /> criterion and further improve basin solids retention . <br /> 2. 3. 4 Interior Earthworks <br /> The IR- 14 containment basin design specifically excludes secondary interior dikes — e . g. , multiple <br /> cells or spur dikes . Multiple cells are typically employed for continual or successive placement projects that <br /> cannot provide adequate time for dewatering the previous deposition . The projected dredging frequency for <br /> Reach III , once every 5 to 10 years , and the relatively small quantities anticipated with each operation, from <br /> 16 ,300 cy to 32,600 cy, do not warrant the use of multiple cells . Spur dikes are typically used in applications <br /> where the basin ' s size or configuration cannot provide adequate retention time . However, hydraulic analysis <br /> 20 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.