My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
decanting process. If at any time during this process effluent turbidity violates water quality standards , the <br /> effluent must be retained until analysis of the interior surface waters shows the suspended solids <br /> concentration to be within acceptable limits . Decanting then continues in this manner until all ponded water <br /> is released over the weir . Subsequent dewatering techniques are discussed in Chapter 4 . 0 . <br /> 3A Effluent Monitoring <br /> As discussed in the preceding section , effluent monitoring will be an integral part of facility <br /> operation . The IR- 14 containment basin has been designed to produce effluent which meets water quality <br /> standards for Class III waters as set forth in Chapter 62-302 of the Florida Administrative Code . These rules <br /> require a comprehensive monitoring program to document permit compliance . The monitoring program <br /> should therefore continue throughout active dredging and decanting operations . Effluent samples should be <br /> taken and analyzed as often as practical . The minimum recommended sampling frequency is two times per <br /> eight hour shift. <br /> Although effluent turbidity is only 1 of 29 parameters addressed in Florida ' s state water quality <br /> standards, compliance with these standards has been historically based on turbidity alone for several reasons . <br /> First, turbidity is reliably measured in the field and is the only water quality parameter over which the site <br /> operator may exercise direct control . Second, turbidity is a strong indicator of general effluent quality since <br /> many contaminants, most notably metals, exhibit a strong amity for fine particles . Thus, reducing turbidity <br /> should result in an overall improvement in effluent quality . <br /> However, the disturbance of contaminated sediments may result in the release of other pollutants <br /> (predominantly nutrients and hydrocarbons) which do not necessarily associate with fine particles . If the in <br /> situ sediments contain elevated levels of these contaminants, turbidity may be an inadequate indicator of <br /> effluent quality . Shoal sediments should undergo comprehensive elutriate and dry analysis to determine the <br /> presence of these contaminants . Additional testing under the effluent monitoring program , if required , should <br /> then focus on those contaminants documented by pre-dredging sediment analysis . <br /> Because effluent turbidity is a primary water quality parameter for site operation, compliance with <br /> turbidity standards will largely control both the dredge plant output and the release of effluent . However, the <br /> 33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.