Laserfiche WebLink
prediction and interpretation of basin performance and effluent quality in terms of these standards can be <br /> problematic . This situation arises from the incompatibility of established design and compliance criteria. <br /> State standards for effluent turbidity are expressed in terms of optical clarity relative to ambient conditions <br /> of the receiving waters. By comparison, containment area design guidelines published by the U . S . Army <br /> Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES) under the Dredged Material Research Program <br /> (DMRP) relate containment area performance to the suspended solids concentration ofthe effluent. The level <br /> of turbidity produced by a specific suspended solids concentration depends highly on the physical <br /> characteristics of the suspended material . Previous investigation (e .g. , Walski and Schroeder, 1978) could <br /> not establish a method to effectively translate suspended solids concentration to optical clarity even for <br /> sediments with well -defined - physical characteristics. The design and operation of this and other similar sites <br /> would greatly benefit from such a predictive relationship . A primary objective of the effluent monitoring <br /> program should be to relate suspended solids concentration to the state performance criterion based on <br /> turbidity for sediments typically encountered in the ICWW. <br /> 3 . 5 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> As discussed in Section 2 . 4, groundwater monitoring forms a key element of Site IR- 14 ' s long-term <br /> management. Sampling and analysis of groundwater throughout the dredging and decanting operation <br /> comprises an essential component of the monitoring program . The duration of this program component <br /> should extend from the start of dredging to the completion of decanting, a period projected to last about 8 to <br /> 12 weeks . <br /> The site ' s first use as a containment facility will likely be the most crucial period for monitoring the <br /> potential seepage of saline water through the dike ' s side slopes and foundation . During this time, soils <br /> forming the dike will be most porous due to their disturbance during site construction . Thus, the initial period <br /> of each dredging operation requires frequent sampling and analysis of groundwater. During the site ' s initial <br /> use, groundwater samples should be taken twice every 24 hours . This sampling regimen should begin at the <br /> start of dredging and continue for a period equivalent to the theoretical transit time of saline water from the <br /> basin to the furthermost sampling well . Maximum transit time should be estimated during the final site <br /> design process, given adequate data to define soil permeability, stratification , and the governing groundwater <br /> flow gradient . Such data should be obtained from core borings taken in association with monitoring well <br /> 34 <br />