My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-283B
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-283B
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/15/2016 2:08:23 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 1:19:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Lease
Approved Date
11/03/2009
Control Number
2009-283B
Agenda Item Number
8.Q.
Entity Name
Florida Inland Navigation District
Subject
Lease Agreement
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
8586
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
prediction and interpretation of basin performance and effluent quality in terms of these standards can be <br /> problematic . This situation arises from the incompatibility of established design and compliance criteria. <br /> State standards for effluent turbidity are expressed in terms of optical clarity relative to ambient conditions <br /> of the receiving waters. By comparison, containment area design guidelines published by the U . S . Army <br /> Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station (WES) under the Dredged Material Research Program <br /> (DMRP) relate containment area performance to the suspended solids concentration ofthe effluent. The level <br /> of turbidity produced by a specific suspended solids concentration depends highly on the physical <br /> characteristics of the suspended material . Previous investigation (e .g. , Walski and Schroeder, 1978) could <br /> not establish a method to effectively translate suspended solids concentration to optical clarity even for <br /> sediments with well -defined - physical characteristics. The design and operation of this and other similar sites <br /> would greatly benefit from such a predictive relationship . A primary objective of the effluent monitoring <br /> program should be to relate suspended solids concentration to the state performance criterion based on <br /> turbidity for sediments typically encountered in the ICWW. <br /> 3 . 5 Groundwater Monitoring <br /> As discussed in Section 2 . 4, groundwater monitoring forms a key element of Site IR- 14 ' s long-term <br /> management. Sampling and analysis of groundwater throughout the dredging and decanting operation <br /> comprises an essential component of the monitoring program . The duration of this program component <br /> should extend from the start of dredging to the completion of decanting, a period projected to last about 8 to <br /> 12 weeks . <br /> The site ' s first use as a containment facility will likely be the most crucial period for monitoring the <br /> potential seepage of saline water through the dike ' s side slopes and foundation . During this time, soils <br /> forming the dike will be most porous due to their disturbance during site construction . Thus, the initial period <br /> of each dredging operation requires frequent sampling and analysis of groundwater. During the site ' s initial <br /> use, groundwater samples should be taken twice every 24 hours . This sampling regimen should begin at the <br /> start of dredging and continue for a period equivalent to the theoretical transit time of saline water from the <br /> basin to the furthermost sampling well . Maximum transit time should be estimated during the final site <br /> design process, given adequate data to define soil permeability, stratification , and the governing groundwater <br /> flow gradient . Such data should be obtained from core borings taken in association with monitoring well <br /> 34 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.