My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2009-183
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2009
>
2009-183
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/10/2016 9:55:32 AM
Creation date
10/1/2015 3:40:36 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Change Order
Approved Date
06/23/2009
Control Number
2009-183
Agenda Item Number
8.H.
Entity Name
FPL Energy Services Inc.
Subject
Change Order No.1 Phase 1 HVAC Improvements
Revised Energy Savings Guarantee
Area
North County Library
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
10718
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Option A-Spot Measured Savings <br /> The verification techniques for Option A determine savings by measuring the capacity or efficiency <br /> of a <br /> system before and after a retrofit and by multiplying the difference by an agreed - upon or " stipulated " factor <br />, <br /> such as hours of operation or load on the system . Option A is best applied to individual loads <br /> or systems <br /> within a building , such as a lighting system or chiller. <br /> Option A is an approach designed for projects in which the potential to generate savings must be verified <br /> , <br /> but the actual savings can be stipulated based on the results of the " potential to generate savings " <br /> verification and engineering calculations ( and perhaps on short-term data collection ) . Post- installation <br /> energy use is not measured throughout the term of the contract . Post- installation and perhaps baseline <br /> energy use is predicted using an engineering or statistical analysis of information that does not involve long - <br /> term measurements . Data from the estimates may come from historical data , information from other similar <br /> projects , and /or spot or short-term metering before and after ECM or system installation during the first year- <br /> of <br /> earof operation . Spot savings is the easiest and least expensive method <br /> of determining savings . <br /> Option A includes procedures for verifying that : <br /> • Baseline conditions have been properly defined . <br /> • The equipment and/or systems that were contracted to be installed have been installed . <br /> • The installed equipment/systems meet contract specifications in terms of quantity , quality , and rating <br /> The installed equipment is operating and performing in accordance with contract specifications and is <br /> meeting all functional tests . <br /> • The installed equipment/systems continue , during the term of the contract , to meet contract <br /> specifications in terms of quantity , quality , rating , operation , and functional performance . <br /> This level of verification is all that is contractually required for certain types of performance contracts . <br /> The <br /> potential to generate savings may be verified through observation , inspections , and/or spot/short-term <br /> metering conducted immediately before and /or immediately after installation Annual ( or some other regular <br /> interval ) inspections may also be conducted to verify an ECM ' s or system ' s continued potential to generate <br /> savings . Savings potential are quantified using computational methods <br /> Indian River County , Florida 19 Indian River County Phase 1 <br /> Phase I Rev . 06/09 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.