My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-328c
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-328c
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/10/2016 11:01:50 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 9:11:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Contract
Approved Date
10/04/2005
Control Number
2005-328C
Agenda Item Number
7.JJ.
Entity Name
Exchange Club Castle
Subject
Valued Visits Children's Services Advisory Grant Contract
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
5194
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
81
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Organization: Exchange Club CASTLE Program: Valued Visits <br /> Funder: Children 's Services Advisory Committee RFP# 7052 <br /> F. PROGRAM EVALUATION (Entire Section F not to exceed two pages) <br /> F <br /> GRAPHICS : What information (data elements) will you need to collect in order <br /> rately describe your target population including demographics (age, gender and <br /> background) required by the funder in Section H? What are the pieces of <br /> ation that qualify them for your target population ? How do you document their <br /> need for services or their "unacceptable condition requiring change" from Section 1119 <br /> Age, gender, ethnicity, marital status, and address are collected upon intake . Eligibility for the <br /> program requires that a judge has deemed that contact between a child and a non-residential <br /> parent poses a risk of harm to that child. Intake and eligibility are further assessed during the <br /> intake and orientation sessions required by Valued Visits . <br /> 7skin <br /> URES : What data elements will you need to collect to show that you have <br /> ed (or made progress toward) your Measurable Outcomes in Section D ? What <br /> r items are you using as measures (grades, survey scores , attendance, absences, <br /> vels) for your program? Are you getting baseline information from a source on <br /> your Collaboration List in Section E ? Are there results from your Activities in Section <br /> D that need to be documented? How often do you need to collect or follow-up on this <br /> data ? <br /> Outcome 1 (successful visits) is measured by visit monitor notes and significant event reports <br /> which track the number of visits terminated for a rules violation. Visit monitor notes are <br /> reviewed weekly; significant events are reviewed immediately, and again quarterly at the Risk <br /> Management committee meeting. <br /> Outcome 2 (learning parenting skills) is measured with competency-based tests (post-tests) given <br /> after each parenting class . Participants must get all answers correct, or remediation is done by <br /> the group facilitator. Tests are collected after every parenting class . <br /> Outcome 3 (satisfaction survey) is measured with a survey that is administered prior to the case <br /> closing. Results are collated quarterly and reported to the Service Delivery committee. <br /> Outcome 4 follow-u contact is performed with families who have been give a service linkage <br /> contact. Contact is made by phone if the family is no longer enrolled in the program, and in <br /> person, if the family is still enrolled. Results are tabulated quarterly, and reported to the Service <br /> Delivery committee. <br /> 3 . REPORTING : What will you do with this information to show that change has <br /> occurred ? How will you use or present these results to the consumer, the funder, the <br /> program, and the community ? How will you use this information to improve your <br /> program? <br /> Information collected is reported to funders on a regular basis , through monthly, quarterly or <br /> semi-annual reports . Staff, board members, employees and other stakeholders are made aware of <br /> results through the CASTLE Continuous Quality Improvement process, and feedback at all-team <br /> and Board meetings . Recommendations for program improvement are developed through this <br /> CQI process . The community is made aware of results through an annual report. <br /> 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.