Laserfiche WebLink
Section V. Alternative Actions (Environmental Review) <br /> The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process requires that at least two alternative actions be considered that <br /> address the same problemlissue as the proposed prglect. In this section, list two feasible alternative projects to mitigate the <br /> « <br /> hazards faced in the project area. One alternative is the No Action Alternative" . <br /> 1 . No Action Alternative <br /> Discuss the impacts on the project area if no action is taken. <br /> See Attached <br /> 2 . Other Feasible Alternative <br /> Discuss a feasible alternative to the proposed project . This could be an entirely different mitigation method or a <br /> significant modification to the design of the current proposed project. Complete all of parts below and include <br /> engineering details (if applicable). <br /> a . Project Description & Scope of Work for the Alternative <br /> Describe, in detail , the alternative project . Also, explain how the alternative project will solve the problem(s) <br /> and/or provide protection from the hazard(s) . <br /> Description of the existing problem- <br /> See Attached <br /> Describe the type(s) of protection that the alternate project will give- <br /> See Attached <br /> Scope of Work (describe in detail, what you are planning to do)- <br /> See Attached <br /> Describe any other on-going or proposed projects in the area that may impact, positively or negatively the proposed HMGP <br /> or FMA project. <br /> See Attached <br /> b . Project Location of the Alternative (describe briefly) <br /> 6d Attach a map or diagram showing the alternative site in relation to the proposed project <br /> site <br /> 6a Photographs (2 copies) of alternative site <br /> 8 <br /> Attach any continuations or additional items to this page <br />