My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2006-322
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2006
>
2006-322
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/30/2016 2:19:25 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 10:03:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Plan
Approved Date
09/19/2006
Control Number
2006-322
Agenda Item Number
9.A.2.
Entity Name
IRC 2020 Comprehensive Plan - Chapter 4
Subject
Transportration Element
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
5833
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
146
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Comprehensive Plan Transportation Element <br /> Since this decision, subsequent analysis determined that a four-lane section (as opposed to the <br /> original five-lanes) on these roadways would enable the county to maintain its LOS "D" standard <br /> while minimizing the impacts to surrounding properties. Consequently, both 27th and 43rd <br /> Avenues have been added to the county' s roadway network as future four-lane divided facilities . <br /> Therefore, level of service "E+20%" can be chanced back to level of service "D" when these <br /> roads are in the first three years of the county' s capital improvement program. <br /> ° Intersection Analysis <br /> Based on the results of the model run produced as a part of the Needs Analysis, corridors with <br /> v/c ratios in the range of 0 .98 and 1 .2 were identified for additional intersection analysis . Since <br /> signals are almost always the constraint points in urban area corridors, the intersection analysis <br /> of these corridors began with an analysis of peak hour operating conditions at these signals. <br /> Signal layout information, signal timing information, and P .M. peak hour turning movement <br /> counts were obtained from the Indian River County traffic engineering division to complete the <br /> analysis. Seasonal factors and growth factors were then applied to project growth rates for each <br /> intersection through the planning horizon of the plan. <br /> The results of the analysis indicate that three signalized intersections are projected to operate at <br /> unacceptable levels of service. These three locations are : <br /> • 43'd Avenue & SR 60 <br /> • US 1 & 32nd Street (Aviation Way) <br /> • CR 510 & 66th Avenue <br /> In addition to level of service, the County should also consider safety when prioritizing <br /> intersection improvements . Together with the intersections listed above, the county should <br /> include other intersections as candidates for improvements based on the annual crash data <br /> collected. Crash data for 2001 are listed on Table 4. 2 . <br /> ° Access Management & Traffic Control <br /> In order to preserve traffic capacity on major arterial roadways, traffic control and access <br /> management measures outlined by the Florida Department of Transportation and the Indian <br /> River County Land Development Regulations need to be closely adhered to . SR 60, US 1 , and <br /> SR AIA have experienced carrying capacity deficiencies from the profusion of side friction by <br /> vehicles entering and exiting from the multiple driveways along each road. Deficiencies in these <br /> roadways exist because existing development is exempt from the access management standards <br /> found in the land development regulations. <br /> Review of on-site traffic flows, access driveways, and new roadway connections should continue <br /> to be conducted during the site plan and subdivision approval process. The County' s land <br /> development regulations provide the basis for these reviews. The land development regulations <br /> outline guidelines for minimum parking requirements, adequate storage bays , spacing and design <br /> Community Development Department Indian River County 78 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.