My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2003-009
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2000's
>
2003
>
2003-009
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/2/2016 11:38:22 AM
Creation date
9/30/2015 6:15:01 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Agreement
Approved Date
01/14/2003
Control Number
2003-009
Agenda Item Number
11.C.1.
Entity Name
Carter Goble Associates, Inc.
Subject
Master Plan Jail needs assessment study
Area
Indian River County jail
Archived Roll/Disk#
3160
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
2794
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
affecting future activities,the booking process,and the impact of specific activities(such as a DUI <br /> crackdown) on other elements of the justice system. Staffing levels and policy changes, which <br /> may have affected the numbers,will be highlighted.The effectiveness of the booking,arraignment <br /> and bond processes ill be reviewed to assess effectiveness and efficiency. <br /> Courts: Variations in caseloads and case flow will be assessed and changes in the number of <br /> judgeships and other key staff within the Courts Administration will be factored into the <br /> assessment. Time to trial and its effect on detention levels will be assessed along with the effects <br /> of any innovations such specialty courts. <br /> Probation and Diversion Programs: Within the adult Probation Department, special attention will <br /> be given to the areas of similarity and to the areas of distinction between adults and juveniles in <br /> order to quantify growth characteristics and trends. The review will monitor changes in the usage <br /> of the different types of programs, both pre-trial/pre-adjudicated and post-sentence/post- <br /> adjudicated to identify trends. Analysis will take account of the timing and reason behind the <br /> introduction of the different programs. Review of the intensive supervision programs and other <br /> intermediate sanctions will be addressed. Usage rates and success rates will be assessed. <br /> Corrections: The Corrections operational analysis will involve a series of meetings and <br /> discussions with staff together with a review of any existing forecasts and projections. <br /> Admissions, length of stay and releases together with gender and status(adult or juvenile)will be <br /> reviewed.An assessment of how Court activity affects the Average Length of Stay in jail (ALOS), <br /> State DOC practice, legislative changes, effects of increased or decreased parole violator <br /> numbers and the effect on local facility admissions will be made. The effect of mandatory <br /> sentencing guidelines will be addressed during this part of the study. Profiles of the ALOS for both <br /> pre-trial and for adjudicated offenders will be developed together with breakdowns of the different <br /> custody classification levels and the potential impact of mandatory sentencing. <br /> Offices of the District Attorney and Public Defender. Not only will caseload information be <br /> accumulated and analyzed for these offices of the Court, but through interviews with key staff in <br /> both offices, the operational parameters that define mission and process will be defined. The <br /> effectiveness and efficiency of caseload management is largely influenced by the behavior of the <br /> prosecution and defense. Therefore, every attempt will be made to define resource and/or <br /> .procedural problems that contribute to delays in case processing. Both Florida AOC and the <br /> American Bar Association guidelines on time for case disposition will be used to assess the <br /> performance of the Court, to include the prosecution and defense. <br /> The data thus collated will be analyzed initially by division to identify specific areas of critical <br /> activity and then as a whole to provide an overview of the manner in which the system has grown <br /> and how the emphasis may have shifted due to extraneous circumstances. Responsibilities for <br /> different aspects and programs or services will be investigated to identify any potential <br /> inefficiencies or duplications. Rates of growth will be documented for each separate division <br /> within the criminal justice system so that the information may be used for more targeted <br /> departmental investigation or analysis as necessary. <br /> Subtask 2.2 Assess Component Effectiveness and Efficiency <br /> An ancillary part of the System Analysis will involve a more detailed look at the programs and <br /> services available within the system in an effort to quantify their usage and examine their <br /> efficiency. Criminal justice policy will be reviewed to understand the evolution to today's situation <br /> and what attempts have been made to reduce case processing time, reduce jail admissions and <br /> length of stay, or the use of incarceration versus local sanctions and supervision. The"intent"of <br /> legislation and policy will be compared to the implementation results as evidenced by available <br /> documents and historic data. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.