My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012-227C.1
CBCC
>
Official Documents
>
2010's
>
2012
>
2012-227C.1
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/7/2016 2:05:06 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 5:05:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Official Documents
Official Document Type
Addendum
Approved Date
12/18/2012
Control Number
2012-227C.1
Agenda Item Number
12.I.2
Entity Name
Dickerson, Florida Inc.
Subject
Addendum No.1
66th Avenue Roadway Improvments
Area
SR 60 to North of 49th Street
Bid Number
2013008
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
11698
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
120
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
ANSWER NO. 49 <br /> FPL and/or the City of Vero Beach Electric will remove and/or relocate all facilities under their <br /> ownership conflicting with the work. The contractor will be responsible for the removal of all other <br /> existing light poles and electrical poles within the limits of construction . <br /> QUESTION NO. 50 <br /> In Kimley Horn plans they call " F Curb Special " . Is this the same as F Curb Modified ? <br /> ANSWER NO. 50 <br /> Yes . <br /> QUESTION NO. 51 <br /> In Kimley Horn plans on sheet 20, the note for F curb Modified states " Reinforcement to be included <br /> only in intersection returns" . Please clarify what kind of reinforcement in F curb is required ? <br /> ANSWER NO. 51 <br /> This note is extraneous and has been removed from the associated detail . <br /> QUESTION NO. 52 <br /> Under which item the 6" concrete around inlets are being paid for? <br /> ANSWER NO. 52 <br /> Items 0425 1901 & 0425 1902 . <br /> QUESTION NO. 53 <br /> Our interpretation of the bridge traffic plans are the following options : <br /> A . ) Either close and construct each bridge separately (all bridges not to exceed 120 calendar days <br /> individually) <br /> B . ) Choose Alternate 1 then separately construct 37th then 45th ( alt . 1 and each bridge following not <br /> to exceed 120 calendar days individually) <br /> C. ) Choose Alternate 2 then separately construct 33rd then 41st then 49th ( alt. 2 and each bridge <br /> following not to exceed 120 calendar days individually) <br /> D . ) Choose Alternate 1 then follow with Alternate 2 ( both alternates not to exceed 120 calendar days <br /> individually) <br /> We just want to make sure that options " B ." and "C ." are available and we are not bound to "D . " or <br /> using both alternates if we choose to go the route of combining bridges . <br /> ANSWER NO . 53 <br /> The road closures for bridge construction is as outlined in Division 2 Technical Provisions Section 102- <br /> Maintenance of Traffic Item F . If the CONTRACTOR chooses Alternative 1 then all the side streets for <br /> bridge construction with Alternative 1 can be closed for a period not to exceed 120 calendar days . <br /> The CONTRACTOR will not be responsible to start Alternative 2 or vice versa immediately after <br /> completing one Alternative . The CONTRACTOR has the option of closing one side street to construct <br /> one bridge at a time, but please note that the substantial completion on the subject project is only <br /> 470 calendar days . <br /> Page 11 of 14 <br /> HPublic WorksIENGINEERING DIVISION PROJECTS`,0545-66T1i Ave SR60 to 57th St (A:tradis)\Admim\Bid Documents\Addendum #21Addendum No. 2 <br /> I l m ] 942.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.