Laserfiche WebLink
QUESTION NO. 54 <br /> Please provide clarification as to whether televising & laser profiling of the proposed drainage pipe <br /> will be required for this project. It was not required on the previous 66th St. Rdwy. Improvements <br /> project (to the south of this one ) . As in the previous project I don 't see anything in the docs stating <br /> that it is or is not required . In the previous project, per addendum # 2, it was not required . Please <br /> clarify. <br /> ANSWER NO. 54 <br /> No, Indian River County will not require televising and laser profiling of the proposed storm drainage <br /> pipes . <br /> QUESTION NO. 55 <br /> Please provide clarification as to what the exact requirements are for the modifications to the existing <br /> control structures . <br /> ANSWER NO. 55 <br /> Refer to plan sheet number 46 of the roadway plans . The existing control structure located at the <br /> Vista Plantation property and at the Woodfield Trillium property will be modified in accordance with <br /> the details shown on plan sheet number 46 . <br /> QUESTION NO. 56 <br /> There are ( at least ) 2 locations that the plan identifies an existing inlet to be adjusted . One of those is <br /> an adjustment of (what appears to be ) an existing type 3 or 4 curb inlet top . That would likely involve <br /> removal / replacement of the (field poured ) top (very different than adjusting a manhole or ditch <br /> bottom inlet) . Under what item will these costs be covered ? <br /> ANSWER NO. 56 <br /> An item has been added for adjusting inlets . <br /> QUESTION NO. 57 <br /> Typical sections on the Arcadis plans, sheets 26-27 of 275, indicates mixing of existing soils with clean . <br /> granular fill material to achieve a minimum permeability rate of 10 ft/day and "refers to plans and <br /> cross sections" . The plans and the cross sections do not indicate the "mixing" of any of the soils . <br /> within the stated stations . Previous areas requiring undercut and replacement had been defined on <br /> the cross sections (sheets 181492, stations 128+00-163+00) and are not indicated to have any special <br /> "enhancement Are we to quantify the volumes based on the use of the typical sections? Please <br /> advise . <br /> ANSWER NO . 57 <br /> The callout "refers to plans and cross sections" pertains to the width between the right of way line <br /> and the edge of the stabilized shoulder. The existing soils within all swale areas and dry detention <br /> areas shall be mixed with clean granular fill material to achieve a minimum permeability rate of 10 <br /> ft/day as shown on the typical sections and pond details . <br /> Page 12 of 14 <br /> F:\Public Worlcs\ENGINEERING DIVISION PRO.IECTS\0545-66711Ave SR60 to 57tH St (A:t=dis)\Admim\Bid Documents\Addendwn #2\Addendum No. 2 <br /> 11 - 19- 12.doc <br />