My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2005-041
CBCC
>
Ordinances
>
2000's
>
2005
>
2005-041
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/13/2017 3:02:23 PM
Creation date
9/30/2015 3:39:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Ordinances
Ordinance Number
2005-041
Adopted Date
09/13/2005
Ordinance Type
Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment
State Filed Date
09\22\2005
Subject
Recreation and Open Space, Solid Waste, and Economic Development Element
Archived Roll/Disk#
3126
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
717
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
impact fee study assessed park needs. That study established a LOS standard of 6.61 acres per 1,000 <br />permanent residents plus weighted seasonal population for unincorporated Indian River County. That <br />This standard should be is based on the total park acreage within the unincorporated portions of the <br />county and the functional permanent population plus weighted seasonal population of the <br />unincorporated county. This 6.61 standard will be used for concurrency reviews. <br />applic-atietts7 <br />and the 5 acres/1,000 people LOS standard for urban/regional parks would set the interim countywide LOS <br />standard at 1 acres/1,000 people. Based on population projections, that standard, if retained, would ensure that <br />remain in place. These districts and information pertaining to them, should be used for planning <br />purposes only, not for concurrency review. For example, if a district's existing LOS is Tess than the <br />adopted countywide LOS, then that district is in need of additional parkland. Development may <br />To determine the best location for now parks within a district with an established need, the county <br />should consider the coverage (service) arca or average travel time radius of existing parks within the <br />district. Areas within the Urban Service Ar a that arc not covered should be considered for new parks. <br />facilities needed at those parks. These techniques should apply to both the undeveloped portions of <br />existing parks and to new parks. These techniques should include a review of demographic <br />of nearby facilities, and a general survey. <br />BeffelirRitwean-d-Lralie-Par-ks <br />all indications are that the population of the county will continue to grow at a rapid pace. For <br />example, the University of Florida's Bureau of Economic and Business Research projects that the <br />t ! <br />nearly 58% population increase in 25 years; and <br />acres of such land is classified as parkland. Of those 356 acres, 192 acres are beachfront parks, and <br />161 acres are riverfront or lakefront parks. <br />When considering these facts, it becomes clear that the county's actual LOS for beach, river and lake <br />parks eventually will drop below any county adopted LOS standard for those types of parks. <br />Therefore, maintaining LOS standards for beach, river and lake parks is not practical or beneficial. <br />Page 41 of the Recreation and Open Space Element <br />Supplement # Ordinance # 2005 <br />Adopted 2005 <br />Exhibit A <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.