8/7/1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT THE PEOPLE IN THIS COMMUNITY ARE CONTENT WITH THE ZONING OF M -Z FOR PIERSON'S ENTERPRISES AS IT IS AN EXISTING JUNK YARD, BUT THEY WOULD LIKE TO KEEP OTHER JUNK YARDS OUT OF THIS AREA, J.R. RODGERS, OWNER OF INDIAN RIVER PARK INC., THE PROPERTY IN QUESTION ON SOUTH GIFFORD ROAD AND THE RAILROAD APPEARED AND STATED THAT HE HAS OWNED THIS PROPERTY SINCE APRIL 1973 WITH THE INTENTION OF DEVELOPING IT WITH HIGH CLASS BUSINESSES AND HE STATED THAT R-213 IS NOT THE BEST USE OF THIS PROPERTY AND IT SHOULD BE LEFT IN INDUSTRIAL ZONING. HE STATED THAT'IT WOULD,.BE ILLOGICAL TO ASSUME THAT THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY SHOULD BE DEVELOPED AS RESIDENTIAL BECAUSE OF .ITS. CLOSE PROXIMITY. T0. THI~ RAILROAD. MR, RODGERS CONTINUED THAT IT HAS NOT BEEN DEVELOPED YET BECAUSE THEY ARE TRYING TO ATTRACT TENANTS WHO WOULD BE AN ASSET TO THE COMMUNITY. THIS PROPERTY WOULD BE DEVELOPED WITH WAREHOUSES WHICH MR. RODGERS FEEL THERE IS A NEED FOR IN INDIAN RIVER COUNTY. THE PROPERTY WOULD BE FENCED TO -PROTECT CHILDREN IN THE AREA, DARRELL FENNELL, ATTORNEY REPRESENTING INDIAN FIVER PARK INC. APPEARED AND STATED THAT LIGHT INDUSTRY WOULD BE THE BEST USE OF THE AREA AND AN ATTRACTIVE BUSINESS PARK COULD ENHANCE THE VALUE OF THE.LAND. THE LOCATION OF THE PROPERTY NEXT TO A RAILROAD BEING ZONED R-213 IS NOT LOGICAL. LOIS KRAMER APPEARED AND REQUESTED CLARIFICATION OF THE PROPOSED C—IA ZONING. ANNA STICKMAN, REAL ESTATE AGENT WORKING WITH THE OWNER OF INDIAN RIVER PARKS APPEARED AND EXPLAINED TO THE BOARD THE REASONS FOR THE DELAY IN COORDINATING BUSINESS FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THIS PROPERTY, MR. BRENNAN STATED THAT WE SHOULD BE CONCERNED WITH WHAT IS BEST FOR THE COMMUNITY. "WE MUST BE CAREFUL OF THE INDIVIDUAL, BUT THE INDIVIDUAL'S PROBLEMS ARE SUBSERVIANT TO THE COMMUNITY IN ANY REZONING." r 25 AUG 7 1974 000x -20 pAcr352