My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/4/1975
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1975
>
6/4/1975
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2024 10:25:37 AM
Creation date
6/10/2015 3:43:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/04/1975
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
JUN 4 1975 <br />• <br />the governing bodies (i.e., the City Council <br />and the Board of County Commissioners) as the <br />recommendations of that commission. <br />(4) Thereafter, the governing bodies would be em- <br />powered to adopt the comprehensive plan by <br />majority vote. (This has been done by the City <br />but not the County.) <br />Following such adoption of the comprehensive <br />plan, under this Chapter, nothing could be <br />"constructed, altered or authorized" which was <br />not in conformity with the plan unless speci- <br />fically authorized by the joint planning com- <br />mission with the concurrence of the governing <br />bodies (The City's Ordinance accomplishes this <br />in part [except for "problem areas"). The pro- <br />posal before the County does not. <br />(6) The comprehensive plan would be subject to <br />review and up -dating at least once each year. <br />(This is embodied in both the City and the <br />proposed County Ordinances.) <br />The governing bodies would be empowered to <br />enact zoning ordinances regulating construction <br />and land uses in conformity with the comprehen- <br />sive plan. (The City's Ordinance contemplates <br />this, but the proposal before the County is <br />contra.) <br />(5) <br />(7) <br />In this City and County, a joint planning commission was <br />created between the City and County which consisted primarily <br />of elected or appointed officeholders. That Commission did <br />not itself gather information, hold public hearings or devel- <br />op a comprehensive plan. Instead, beginning in August 1971, <br />and each year thereafter, the joint planning commission, on <br />behalf of and with the approval of the City and County gover- <br />ning bodies, entered into contracts with the Department of <br />Community Affairs "under Chapter �" for 701 funds to finance <br />these activities. They also entered into concurrent contracts <br />with Adley & Associates to engage in these activities in their <br />behalf with the assistance of the joint City - County planning <br />department. Thus, the joint planning commission was a conduit <br />for disbursing contracted 701 funds to Adley & Associates and, <br />in part, to the joint planning departr nt. Of course, addi- <br />tional local tax funds were expended on thr-e activities by <br />the planning department. <br />-4- <br />4 <br />1.c:r. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.