My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
6/9/1976
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1976
>
6/9/1976
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:28:19 AM
Creation date
6/9/2015 4:26:54 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/09/1976
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I a' <br />t <br />ATTORNEY KRAMER NOTED THAT THAT ACTUALLY IS NOT THE POINT; <br />THERE IS STILL THE FREEDOM TO DISREGARD IT, AND HE REQUESTED THAT THE <br />BOARD RECONSIDER THE PROPOSED ORDINANCE OR POSSIBLY INSTRUCT THE <br />ATTORNEY TO REVIEW THEIR PROPOSED ALTERNATE ORDINANCE, <br />ft <br />J <br />IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS POINTED OUT THAT THIS ALTERNATE ORDINANCE <br />HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN REVIEWED BOTH BY THE ZONING COMMISSION AND THE <br />BOARD AND THAT ATTORNEY COLLINS HAS PREPARED THE ORDINANCE UNDER DIS- <br />CUSSION TODAY AS INSTRUCTED BY THE BOARD. <br />ASSISTANT PLANNER BERG STATED THAT HE FELT ATTORNEY KRAMER <br />IS CONFUSING PLANNING AND COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING WITH ZONING. HE NOTED <br />THAT MR. KRAMER WANTS TO REZONE THE ENTIRE COUNTY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH <br />THE -PLAN BY 1979. HE AGREED THAT WE WILL GET TO THE POINT OVER A PERIOD u j <br />OF TIME, DEPENDING ON GROWTH, BUT IN THE INTERIM THERE ARE GOING TO BE l <br />CHANGES IN THE PLAN. MR. BERG POINTED OUT THAT IF YOU WERE TO REZONE <br />THE ENTIRE COUNTY TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE PLAN, HE FELT THE COUNTY <br />j <br />WOULD BE. OBLIGATING ITSELF TO PUT IN ROADS AND SUPPLY SERVICES IN ANY <br />R-1 AREA EVEN THOUGH THEY MIGHT NOT BE NEEDED AT THE PRESENT TIME, HE 1 <br />CONTINUED THAT THE PLANNERS HAVE INCLUDED IN THEIR PLAN, WHICH IS GEARED <br />TO THE YEAR 1900, A GROWTH POLICY AND ALLOWED FOR A GROWTH ELEMENT. MR. <br />BERG NOTED THAT ANY PLAN MUST CHANGE AND FELT IF YOU WERE TO REZONE <br />SECTION BY SECTION, BY THE TIME YOU GOT TO THE LAST SECTION, THE FIRST <br />SECTION WOULD BE OUT OF DATE. HEyALSO STATED HE DID NOT BELIEVE THE ACT <br />ACTUALLY STATES THAT YOU HAVE TO REZONE, <br />CHAIRMAN SIEBERT NOTED THAT BUILDING PERMITS COULD NOT BE ISSUED* <br />UNLESS THE PROJECT IS IN CONFORMITY WITH THE MASTER PLAN. <br />ATTORNEY KRAMER POINTED OUT THAT THE MASTER PLAN WILL BE RE- <br />VIEWED ON A YEARLY BASIS UNDER EITHER ORDINANCE AND NOTED THAT THE <br />STATE ACT REQUIRES THAT "ALL DEVELOPMENT UNDERTAKEN IN REGARD TO LAND <br />COVERED BY SUCH PLAN OR ELEMENT SHALL BE CONSISTENT WITH SUCH PLAN OR <br />ELEMENT AS ADOPTED." <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />MASSEY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY CLOSED THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER MASSEY, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />t: <br />SCHMUCKER, TO ADOPT ORDINANCE 76-12 - THE INDIAN RIVER COUNTY COMPREHEN- <br />SIVE PLANNING ORDINANCE OF 1976. <br />41 <br />1 z. <br />it, <br />41 <br />1 z. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.