Laserfiche WebLink
® ® r <br />REZONED BECAUSE IT IS PART OF THE LARGER PARCEL AND IT WOULD NOT BE <br />LOGICAL TO LEAVE ONE LITTLE PARCEL R-3. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT IT WOULD BE TO MR. ZIMMERMAN'S ADVAN- <br />TAGE TO GO ALONG WITH THE NEW ZONING WHICH WOULD GIVE HIM MORE FLEXI- <br />BILITY. HE NOTED THAT TAXES.ON THE -33` WOULD BE MINIMAL. <br />MR. ZIMMERMAN COMPLAINED THAT HIS DEED DOES NOT GIVE HIM <br />ACCESS -TO THE RIVER, BUT ATTORNEY HENDERSON INFORMED THE BOARD THAT <br />THE CONDES ALLOW -MR. ZIMMERMAN TO USE THEIR ACCESS. <br />MR, ZIMMERMAN STATED THAT THEY COULD SELL THIS PROPERTY. <br />COMMISSIONER Loy POINTED OUT THAT IF THE ZONING CHANGE IS <br />MADE, THE OWNER COULD NOT.SELL ANYTHING UNTIL THE LAND IS PLATTED <br />AND SUBDIVIDED. <br />EDWARD KITCHING INFORMED THE BOARD THAT HE AND HIS WIFE <br />OWN PROPERTY JUST NORTH OF THE SUBJECT PROPERTY, AND WHILE THEY ARE <br />NOT OPPOSED TO THE PROPOSED REZONING, THEY DO.OPPOSE TAKING THE . <br />FRONT PART OUT OF COMMERCIAL. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED THAT A LETTER WRITTEN BY MR. & MRS. <br />KITCHING BE MADE A PART OF THE MINUTES. <br />a <br />62 <br />Ci 91977 . , soon 31 pAu.32. <br />