Laserfiche WebLink
THAT HE IS ALWAYS IN FAVOR OF UPGRADING PRESENTATIONS MADE TO THE <br />VARIOUS COUNTY AGENCIES AND SAID HIS APPROACH WOULD NOT BE TO PUT IN <br />THE AMENDMENTS OUTLINED BY ARCHITECT JOHN SCHLITT, BUT RATHER JUST <br />INCLUDE A PARAGRAPH STATING THAT THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH FLORIDA <br />STATUTE 467.09. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE FELT THIS SHOULD BE INCLUDED, AND THEN IT <br />CAN BE DISCUSSED AT THE PUBLIC HEARING. <br />.'COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER POINTED OUT THAT THERE IS A CONFLICT <br />BETWEEN ARCHITECTS AND ENGINEERS INVOLVED, AND HE FELT THIS WOULD DIS- <br />CRIMINATE AGAINST ENGINEERS. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS STATED THAT HE WOULD PREFER JUST TO PUT IN <br />A PARAGRAPH REQUIRING COMPLIANCE WITH THE STATUTE AND LET THE ARCHI- <br />TECTS AND ENGINEERS SETTLE ANY CONFLICT THEY MIGHT HAVE OVER INTERPRE- <br />TATION OF THE STATUTE. <br />MOTION WAS MADE BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COM- <br />MISSIONER Loy,.TO AUTHORIZE THE ATTORNEY TO INCLUDE A STATEMENT REQUIR- <br />ING COMPLIANCE WITH FLORIDA STATUTE 467.09 IN THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN <br />ORDINANCE. <br />COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER CONTENDED THAT THIS STATUTE RELATES TO <br />ARCHITECTS RATHER THAN ENGINEERS, AND HE FELT A STATEMENT SHOULD BE IN- <br />CLUDED STATING itEITHERARCHITECTS OR ENGINEERS, It <br />IN FURTHER DISCUSSION, IT WAS AGREED THE ATTORNEY SHOULD CHECK <br />THE STATUTES FURTHER, <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. COMMISSIONER SCHMUCKER <br />VOTE•D•IN OPPOSITION; ALL OTHER VOTED IN FAVOR, AND•THE MOTION CARRIED. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS REQUESTED THAT AN EMERGENCY ITEM BE ADDED <br />TO THE AGENDA IN REGARD TO AUTHORIZING APPRAISALS ON INDIAN RIVER BOU- <br />LEVARD.- <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />DEESON, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY ADDED TO TODAY'S AGENDA THE EMERGENCY <br />ITEM REQUESTED BY THE ATTORNEY. ' <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS INFORMED THE BOARD THAT WE HAVE.LEGAL DE- <br />SCRIPTIONS AND PLANS FOR INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, BUT HAVE TO HAVE <br />APPRAISALS DONE ON ABOUT FIVE PARCELS OF PROPERTY BECAUSE THE DOT NEVER <br />MADE THEM, HE ASKED TO BE AUTHORIZED TO HIRE AN APPRAISER TO DO THIS <br />WORK. <br />44 <br />600K 34 FAG' 166 <br />7 <br />