Laserfiche WebLink
0 <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER Loy, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />SCHMUCKER, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY AUTHORIZED THE ATTORNEY TO HIRE AN <br />APPRAISER TO DO THE NECESSARY APPRAISAL WORK ON INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. <br />CHAIRMAN WODTKE DISCUSSED A LETTER RECEIVED FROM CIVIL <br />DEFENSE DIRECTOR, S. LEE NUZIE, SOLICITING THE BOARD'S SUPPORT OF <br />A FLORIDA STATE EMERGENCY OPERATING CENTER BECAUSE FLORIDA IS THE ONLY <br />STATE THAT DOES NOT HAVE ONE, AND HE FEELS IT IS AN IMPORTANT PROJECT. <br />IN DISCUSSION, IT WAS GENERALLY FELT THAT THE MANDATED <br />PROGRAMS ARE MORE IMPORTANT THAN A STATE EMERGENCY HEADQUARTERS. CHAIR- <br />MAN WODTKE WILL DO FURTHER CHECKING AND REPORT BACK ON THIS MATTER. <br />BETTY KHAIL OF THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, CAME BEFORE THE <br />BOARD IN REGARD TO THEIR REQUEST FOR $3,809.00 TO COVER ANTICIPATED <br />EXPENDITURES FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH UNDER THE LEAA GRANT FOR THE YOUTH <br />AID BUREAU. SHE EXPLAINED THAT THE BOARD HAS HAD THESE GRANT FUNDS <br />SINCE NOVEMBER, BUT THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT HAS JUST HIRED TWO MEN <br />AND NOW HAVE TO REQUEST THE MONEY FROM THE STATE. MRS. KHAIL NOTED <br />THAT THIS CANNOT BE REQUESTED IN ADVANCE, BUT ONLY AS THE MONEY IS <br />NEEDED. <br />IN DISCUSSION, THE BOARD SUGGESTED THAT THESE REQUESTS BE <br />MADE A PART OF THE CLERK'S AGENDA AS A MONTHLY ITEM. <br />ON MOTION BY COMMISSIONER SIEBERT, SECONDED BY COMMISSIONER <br />LOY, THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY APPROVED $3,809.00 BEING PAID TO THE SHERIFF'S <br />DEPARTMENT FROM THE LEAA GRANT FOR THE YOUTH AID BUREAU TO COVER AN- <br />TICIPATED EXPENDITURES FOR THE MONTH OF MARCH, 1978. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REPORTED TO THE BOARD THAT HE HAS HAD <br />MEETINGS WITH THE.ADMINISTRATOR, THE PERSONNEL DIRECTOR, AND DICK BIRD, <br />CHAIRMAN OF THE ZONING .BOARD, IN REGARD TO THE POSSIBLE RESTRUCTURING <br />OF THE PLANNING AND ZONING DEPARTMENTS. HE STATED THAT THEY ARE RECOM- <br />MENDING A DIRECTOR OF PLANNING AND ZONING BE HIRED WHO WOULD HAVE THE <br />ADMINISTRATIVE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE ZONING DEPARTMENT, THE PERSONNEL <br />RESPONSIBILITIES, AND THE RESPONSIBILITY OF INTERPRETING THE ZONING <br />ORDINANCE. THE STANDARD METHODS OF APPEAL WOULD STILL BE IN EXISTENCE. <br />UNDER THIS SORT OF STRUCTURE, THE DIRECTOR WOULD STILL MAINTAIN THE <br />45 <br />MAR 2 2 197 momu -"7 <br />J <br />