My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/03/2006 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2006
>
10/03/2006 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/20/2022 1:12:15 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:11:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
10/03/2006
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3125
Book and Page
131, 470-561
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
80
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Commissioner Wheeler questioned what would happen if the Motion passed and there <br />was no more counting or if it failed and they moved forward with it. Administrator Baird responded that <br />if they made the decision to move forward then staff would have to look at trying to make it work. He <br />also thought the only solution could be that they make anyone who affects the trips on Route 60 pay their <br />proportionate share of the interest cost. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis felt they needed to add “and US.1” to recommendation. Although <br />the Board discussed and felt it was not the same issue, Commissioner Davis still sees it as one and the <br />same, hoping that they would be addressed and go forward together. Chairman Neuberger thought they <br />should have a separate workshop to discuss US.1 and they should only discuss SR 60. <br /> <br />Commissioner Davis wanted to see some clear direction in four (4) months and would <br />support Commissioner Wheeler’s Motion even if he did not amend it to four (4) months. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lowther read a section of the backup regarding “the benefits of <br />accelerating construction …”, stating that he did not think they would want to lower the level of service. <br /> Commissioners Bowden and Lowther agreed that they need to stop the ‘flip-flopping” as <br />they have talked this over already. <br /> <br />Mr. Mechling <br />againentreated the Board not to lose the vision of the future but have a <br />concept of where this County is going economically. <br /> <br />Chairman Neuberger agreed that they needed to keep this going stating that they could <br />have a workshop to talk about this. <br /> <br />The Board and staff indulged in lengthy and involved discussions on whether there was a <br />time-frame to have this done, the reasons Administrator Baird put this on the Agenda, and whether they <br />could leave the trips off if they extended this for sixty (60) days. Attorney Collins provided legal opinion <br />October 3, 2006 <br />54 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.