Laserfiche WebLink
and effective; clay barrier walls sometimes restrict horizontal water movement and will basically <br />flood an adjacent property. <br />Mr. Cramer explained why he objected to Recommendation No. 15. C., <br />"...requiring a 300' setback between all on-site activity areas.... and any adjacent public <br />conservation land or easement." <br />A detailed discussion ensued between the Board, staff, and Mr. Cramer regarding <br />conservation easements; the validity of the 300' setback; draw down protection; the "cone of <br />depression"; and the use of perimeter retention to offset dewatering impacts. <br />Mr. Adair did not believe the current regulation of a 150' setback was enough. <br />Shawn Sexton, 7880 37th Street, felt that the 300' setback might be required to <br />make any necessary corrective measures. <br />Suzon Franzke, 8190 37th Street, stated that the property rights of residents in <br />AG -1, who pay higher taxes, are being significantly impacted by having industrial mines in AG- <br />A. <br />The Chairman called a recess at 3: 30 p.m. and reconvened the meeting at 3:43 <br />p.m. with all members present. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan wanted to define "easement" as a conservation easement <br />on Recommendation No. 15.C. "Consider requiring a 300' setback between all on-site activity <br />areas (excavation, stockpile, on-site haul road) and any adjacent public conservation land or <br />easement". <br />8 <br />October 6, 2008 <br />