10/26/1978 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r d 0 m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oy STATED THAT IF WE SHOULD INCREASE COMMERCIAL DEVELOPMENT NEAR THE SCHOOL, SHE FELT WE WOULD BE BETTER OFF WITH IT ON THE SAME SIDE OF THE ROAD. 36 OCT 2 01978 MIX 7 mu -.152