Laserfiche WebLink
6. COMMENTS AND QUESTIONS FROM THE PUBLIC <br />Chuck Mechling, Pointe West, wanted the Board to consider leaving "preliminary plat" in <br />the recommendations and he wanted to see consideration in the Ordinance for attainable housing. <br />There was a brief discussion regarding Mr. Mechling's concerns. <br />Joseph Paladin, 6450 Tropical Way, would like to see a cap with a `number" for building <br />permits. He said if the Board changed the pending Ordinance and incorporated a percentage into <br />the new Ordinance, then people could vest at "LDP" and there would be fewer projects that would <br />be stopped because of the 10 or 20 trip cap. <br />Discussion ensued as Commissioner Davis suggested reserving capacity and allowing time <br />for the Board to make a decision then implement a remedy, but Director Keating thought it would <br />become a logistical problem. <br />Chairman Wheeler summarized two potential objectives: (1) ration the amount of <br />available capacity that could be vested for a development project and prevent large projects from <br />obtaining the last portion of available capacity; and (2) where would the money come from to build <br />roads. He explained the validity of both and said he would like to see a percentage or number at <br />the "tail end" so the small builders would have an opportunity to participate in the system. <br />Chris Mora, Assistant Public Works Director, and Director Boling, explained rationing <br />the "right number" of trips, and the establishment of smaller assignment thresholds. <br />Commissioner Davis wanted to know if it would be better to go with a number or a <br />percentage. Assistant Director Mora explained that a number would be preferred because a set <br />number would not be easy to comprehend or enforce. <br />January 5, 2007 4 <br />CHAPTER 910 <br />