My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
5/24/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
5/24/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:38 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:02:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Special Call Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
05/24/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED IF SPECIAL TYPE EQUIPMENT IS NEEDED TO' <br />DO THIS INSPECTION. <br />MR. BERTOSSA SAID THAT THEY ARE NOT GOING TO BRING OUT ANY <br />SPECIALIZED EQUIPMENT, SUCH AS X-RAYS, AS THE BRIDGES IN THE COUNTY ARE <br />OF A STANDARD DESIGN -AND RELATIVELY SOUND. <br />MR. BRESSANI COMMENTED THAT THE BRIDGES CONSTRUCTED WITH <br />TIMBER MIGHT POSE SOME PROBLEMS AND INSPECTION MIGHT BE TIME-CONSUMING. <br />ADMINISTRATOR KENNINGS NOTED THAT THE FORM OF BRIDGE THE <br />COUNTY USES IS THE SAME THAT THE DOT USES. HE STATED THAT SOME BRIDGES <br />ARE OLD AND CARRY HEAVY FRUIT TRUCKS; AND MOST OF -THE BRIDGES ARE THE <br />COUNTY'S, BUT SOME ARE PRIVATE BRIDGES GOING INTO GROVES. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THEY EVER RAN INTO ANY ENVIRON- <br />MENTAL PROBLEMS WHILE MAKING INSPECTIONS. <br />MR.-BERTOSSA STATED THAT IT DEPENDED ON WHAT THEY HAVE TO DO <br />AS SOME OF THE REPAIRS MIGHT POSSIBLY BE INVOLVED WITH: --FILL, AND <br />APPROACH WORK. HE CONTINUED THAT IF THE BRIDGE HAD TO BE TOTALLY <br />REPLACED, WE WOULD HAVE TO GO INTO THE PERMITTING PROCESS. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT ASKED IF THE FIRM WOULD ADVISE THE <br />COUNTY OF ANY ENVIRONMENTAL PROBLEMS IN THEIR RECOMMENDATIONS, AND MR. <br />BERTOSSA REPLIED AFFIRMATIVELY. <br />ADMINISTRATOR .JENNINGS THEN ASKED MR. BERTOSSA TO DEFINE TOTAL .` <br />REPLACEMENT AND REGULAR MAINTENANCE. <br />MR. BERTOSSA EXPLAINED THAT IN TOTAL REPLACEMENT, THE COUNTY <br />WOULD HAVE TO NOTIFY THE VARIOUS AGENCIES SIMPLY BY LETTER, AS NO <br />ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT IS NEEDED OR REQUIRED; AND IN REGULAR <br />ROUTINE MAINTENANCE, THE COUNTY WOULD NOT HAVE TO CONTACT THE ENVIRON- <br />MENTALISTS IN ORDER TO PROCEED, <br />COMMISSIONER LYONS ASKED HOW THE FIRM WOULD GET PAID FOR <br />THEIR WORK. <br />MR. BERTOSSA WOULD SET THE FEE ARRANGEMENT ACCORDING TO THE <br />BOARD'S SUGGESTIONS. HE STATED.THEY COULD GIVE A BREAK -DOWN ON EACH <br />BRIDGE OR ON A SALARY PLUS. COST BASIS)BUT..INOST OF THEIR WORK WAS.DONE <br />ON A LUMP -SUM BASIS.' <br />4 <br />MAY ,`i 4 1979 BOOK- 40, PACE 364 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.