My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12/5/1979
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
1970's
>
1979
>
12/5/1979
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/23/2015 11:43:40 AM
Creation date
6/11/2015 11:14:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
12/05/1979
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
67
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
COMMISSIONER SIEBERT STATED THAT HE WOULD VOTE AGAINST <br />THE MOTION BECAUSE HE DID NOT BELIEVE YOU WILL GET THAT LAND BACK <br />INTO CITRUS JUST BY DENYING THE REZONING. HE DID NOT FEEL THAT 8 <br />UNITS IS A BAD PROPOSAL, AND HE DID NOT FEEL IT IS FEASIBLE FOR SOMEONE <br />OWNING JUST IO ACRES TO REPLANT AND MAKE AN ECONOMIC UNIT. <br />THE CHAIRMAN CALLED FOR THE QUESTION. IT WAS VOTED ON <br />WITH COMMISSIONER SIEBERT VOTING IN OPPOSITION, AND THE MOTION CARRIED <br />4 TO 1. <br />COMMISSIONER SIEBERT REPORTED ON THE PROPOSED LEASE WITH <br />THE SUNSHINE REHABILITATION CENTER AND PRESENTED A SURVEY SHOWING THE <br />LOCATION OF THE FOOTBALL FIELD IN RELATION TO THE PROPOSED BUILDING <br />SITE. HE STATED THAT THE WHOLE FOOTBALL FIELD IS IN THEIR LEASE AREA <br />AND INFORMED THE BOARD THAT THE FOOTBALL FIELD WAS PLACED ON THIS <br />PROPERTY WITH THE CONSENT OF THE SUNSHINE CENTER WITH THE UNDERSTANDING <br />THAT SOME DAY THEY; WERE GOING TO EXPAND. COMMISSIONER SIEBERT CON- <br />TINUED THAT HE MET WITH THE SCHOOL BOARD AND CITY OFFICIALS, AND <br />EVERYONE SEEMED TO AGREE THAT IT WOULD BE BEST TO RELOCATE THE FIELD <br />AT ANOTHER SITE. THERE STILL, HOWEVER, ARE INGRESS -AND EGRESS PROBLEMS, <br />AND ARCHITECT CHARLES BLOCK HAS OFFERED TO REDESIGN THE PARKING STRIP, <br />WHICH POSSIBLY COULD GO SIDEWISE. <br />DISCUSSION CONTINUED ON LOCATION OF THE FOOTBALL FIELD <br />AND POSSIBLE REDUCTION OF THE SIZE OF THE LEASED AREA. <br />ATTORNEY SAM BLOCK, WHO REPRESENTS SUNSHINE REHABILITATION <br />CENTER, STATED THAT WHAT THEY MAINLY WANT IS A 30 YEAR LEASE WITH A <br />30 YEAR OPTION, AND BASED ON THE VARIOUS DISCUSSIONS, HE FELT IT <br />COULD BE REDESIGNED AND SPLIT IN HALF BY A NORTH AND SOUTH LINE SINCE <br />IT IS INCOMPATIBLE SIDE BY SIDE. <br />ATTORNEY COLLINS NOTED THAT BASICALLY HE IS ASKING FOR A <br />LEASE ON THE EAST HALF OF THE PROPERTY, AND CHAIRMAN WODTKE ASKED <br />IF WE COULD RETAIN ACCESS SOMEWHERE IN THE REAR. <br />ATTORNEY BLOCK STATED THAT THEY WOULD FENCE ACROSS THE BACK <br />TO SEPARATE THEM FROM THE RECREATIONAL ACTIVITIES, AND COMMISSIONER <br />Loy STATED THAT SHE WOULD LIKE TO CUT OFF 20` FOR ACCESS. <br />DEC 51919 <br />51 <br />BOOK 4, PACE 229 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.