1/9/1980 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

COMMISSIONER LYONS DISCUSSED THE=POSSIBILITY OF -HAVING AN - AGREEMENT ABOUT TRAFFIC IMPACT FEES, NOTING THAT HE HAD SUPPLIED A COPY OF SUCH AN AGREEMENT FOR THE COMMISSIONS INFORMATION AT THE LAST MEETING. HE COMMENTED THAT THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT AT VERO HIGHLANDS PROMPTED HIM TO THINK ABOUT THE TRAFFIC SITUATION THAT WILL BE GENERATED DOWN THE LINE. HE ASKED IF WE ARE NOW IN A POSITION TO HAVE SUCH AN AGREEMENT OR WHETHER WE NEED ENABLING LEGISLATION. ATTORNEY COLLINS FELT THAT THE RIGHTS WE NOW HAVE ARE MORE BARGAINING RIGHTS AND THAT IMPACT FEES SHOULD BE ADDRESSED BY A SEPARATE ORDINANCE, POSSIBLY EITHER IN THE SITE PLAN ORDINANCE OR SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE, THE CHAIRMAN REQUESTED THE ATTORNEY TO RESEARCH THIS MATTER AND MAKE A REPORT. COMMISSIONER LYONS SUGGESTED THAT SINCE WE ARE NOW IN THE PROCESS OF RE-ENGINEERING INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD, WE SHOULD CONSIDER BICYCLE PATHS IN THIS CONNECTION AND HAVE COMMISSIONER LOY`S COMMITTEE MAKE A RECOMMENDATION. THE ADMINISTRATOR AGREED AND NOTED THAT HE WILL BE TAKING PLANS AND MYLARS TO REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS SHORTLY. COMMISSIONER LYONS REPORTED THAT IN THE COURSE OF TRYING TO PICK A FIRM FOR THE DRAINAGE STUDIES, HE HAS VISITED REYNOLDS, SMITH & HILLS AND CERTAINLY CONFIRMS OUR CHOICE OF THEM TO WORK ON THE ENGINEERING OF INDIAN RIVER BOULEVARD. COMMISSIONER LYONS INQUIRED ABOUT BUILDING CODE AMENDMENTS, AND THE ATTORNEY INFORMED HIM THAT THE AMENDMENT TO THE ENERGY CODE IS SET FOR A HEARING ON FEBRUARY 61 1980. ATTORNEY COLLINS NEXT DISCUSSED PROBLEMS BEING ENCOUNTERED BY THE 1979 PROPERTY APPRAISAL ADJUSTMENT BOARD. HE EXPLAINED THAT THE FLORIDA STATUTES PROVIDE THAT THE PROPERTY APPRAISER CAN SUE THE BOARD UNDER. CERTAIN CONDITIONS, ONE OF WHICH IS IF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER ALLEGES TO THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE THAT THERE HAS BEEN A CONSISTENT AND CONTINUOUS VIOLATION OF THE INTENT OF THE LAW BY 115 BOOK`"PAGE"•