My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/22/2004
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2004
>
06/22/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/23/2022 4:34:08 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:04:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
06/22/2004
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2928
Book and Page
127, 212-256
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
428
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Administrator Baird assured her there is none. <br /> <br />The Chairman opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to be heard <br />regarding this matter. <br /> <br />Frank Coffey, <br /> 1200 Admirals Walk, Chairman of the Emergency Services <br />Advisory Committee said the Committee had a great deal of discussion regarding the need for <br />additional staff and the Committee supported the proposal. <br /> <br />C. N. Curry <br />, Roseland, supported the issue but was concerned with several areas <br />of the Ordinance particularly Chapter 208.10 (1), abatement of hazardous materials. He wanted <br />the Board to do a comparison with Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) <br />requirements because currently they are monitoring it. He felt provisions regulating quantity <br />emission was necessary for some small businesses rather than overall regulation covering all <br />situations. Chapter 208.10 (3) he felt was redundant and provided no specifics or limitations. He <br />felt the sale of fireworks should be outside in a tent rather than enclosed in a building should any <br />fireworks break loose. He questioned whether the fee of $50 was for each test or per property and <br />Chief JusticeMr. Curry <br /> replied it is a fee per trip. stated he has been an advocate of user fees in <br />many issues. In this case where fire prevention is a public issue, he felt it should be treated as an <br />overall public expense. <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Adams, SECONDED <br />by Chairman Ginn, the Board unanimously continued <br />the public hearing to July 6, 2004. <br /> <br />(CLERKâS NOTE: Item 13.C. was heard prior to Item 9.B.1., but is placed chronologically in the <br />minutes for continuity purposes. At the conclusion of Item 13.C. Commissioner Adams left the <br />meeting to attend the FACo Conference in Hollywood, Florida.) <br /> <br />JUNE 22, 2004 <br />19 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.