My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/10/2007 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2007
>
07/10/2007 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 4:22:44 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:12:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC Regular Meeting
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/10/2007
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3132
Subject
Concurrency Regulations
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
3098
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
54
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Chairman Wheeler felt that if we don't have any ability to stop the annexation of the <br />18,000 acres then the only other option is to have to have a public hearing, move forward on the <br />Charter and let the public vote on whether they want the Charter or not. <br />Commissioner Davis believed it was the votes on the City Council in Fellsmere that <br />would stop annexation, and that is what we have in place to change policy and direction. <br />City Manager Nunemaker addressed comments from the Board, in particular, <br />whether Fellsmere had acted in good faith. Mr. Nunemaker presented different ways in which they <br />have dealt with the issues in good faith, and have demonstrated their willingness to work with the <br />County. He stated that the legislative intent would show that it was the County that acted contrary <br />to Chapter 171. He remarked that so many issues have come up about the agreement with <br />Fellsmere Joint Venture (FJV), and he wanted to point out that they have achieved nearly % billion <br />dollars in extractions off the bat, if they use County calculus. Fellsmere is proposing that of the <br />18,000 acres, 50% or 9,000 acres would be open space. <br />Mr. Nunemaker answered various questions from the Board regarding open space <br />and urban sprawl. He talked about economic development and considers FJV their Piper. <br />Commissioner Flescher asked what was the justification or reason given by FJV for <br />the delay of the 14,000 annexations. Mr. Nunemaker explained that they wanted to give some <br />more room to the Interlocal Service Boundary Agreement process. <br />Commissioner O'Bryan did not want to imply that Fellsmere had not done good <br />things and had not acted in good faith, but believed Fellsmere had not followed in good faith with <br />part 2 of the ILA. He had asked for them to table the annexations until the full course of the ILAs <br />have been worked out, and Fellsmere had not done so. <br />July 10, 2007 40 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.