My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
7/15/2003
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2003
>
7/15/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/4/2017 2:52:31 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:06:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
07/15/2003
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
2570
Book and Page
125, 586-610
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
502
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
the mall, staff would have supported multi -family in this location if the PD opportunity were not <br />available. The PD opportunity allows flexibility and they are preserving wetlands, significantly <br />exceeding the open space requirements, and using the flexibility to provide a better, more innovative <br />design. <br />Chairman Macht felt it would be helpful in the near future to plan some public information <br />vehicle regarding the Comprehensive Plan to correct the misunderstanding that some members of <br />the public have in that they feel this Board has the power to limit development by just saying "no". <br />They evidently do not understand that property rights are regulated by law and, in our case, by the <br />Comprehensive Plan. Under our zoning categories, we have the latitude to negotiate with <br />developers for density reductions and a more harmonious use of properties by using trade offs in the <br />application of the law in the use of the property the developer owns. We also have the right to <br />permit development only on the eastern side of the Urban Service Area which produces a more <br />orderly development. We also have ourselves and other governmental agencies which own about <br />40% of the property in conservation use with no opportunity for development forever. That <br />property is set aside in perpetuity and can never be built on but is kept for the benefit of public <br />conservation issues and the enjoyment of open space. This commission and future commissions do <br />not have the right to deny persons the right to develop their own lands. He did believe that the way <br />our County is being developed outshines our sister counties. <br />In response to questioning, Public Works Director Jim Davis stated that traffic distribution <br />studies are done by computer model and are distributed from potential residential sites to <br />employment centers and other attractors. The traffic engineer looks into the computer model and, <br />in this particular case, there are very few commercial or employment centers to the north. Most of <br />the commercial district is on SR -60 and logic states that people will take the shortest trip length to <br />shopping and employment. The bridge in question is on the one -cent optional sales tax 5 -year <br />program for replacing bridges and is in the next design group. By the time this project is acquiring <br />certificates of occupancy, that bridge will be replaced. <br />Commissioner Lowther asked that a stipulation be added regarding the connection of the <br />drainage to the Sunniland community. <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Lowther, SECONDED by Commissioner <br />Adams, the Board unanimously approved the PD rezoning and conceptual <br />JULY 15, 2003 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.