Laserfiche WebLink
<br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Davis, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Bowden, the Board unanimously adopted <br />Ordinance No. 2005-041 amending the text of the <br />Comprehensive Plan’s Recreation and Open Space <br />Element, Solid Waste Sub-Element, and the Economic <br />Development Element; and providing severability and <br />effective date. <br /> <br />9.A.7. PUBLIC HEARING – ORDINANCE NO. 2005-042 – COUNTY <br />INITIATED AMENDMENT TO THE CONSERVATION <br />ELEMENT AND COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT OF <br />THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN (LEGISLATIVE) <br />PROOF OF PUBLICATION OF ADVERTISEMENT FOR HEARING <br />IS ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK TO THE BOARD <br /> <br />Environmental Planning & Code Enforcement Chief Roland DeBlois reviewed the <br />memorandum using a PowerPoint outline. He stated that the main focus of this amendment is a <br />revision to conservation policy 6.12 to clarify that fee-in-lieu of native upland preservation will be <br />accepted only as a last alternative when on-site upland preservation is not feasible. Also it will <br />revise the Coastal Management Element analysis section, objectives and policies to reflect <br />objectives and policies adopted in the Indian River County Manatee Protection and Boating Safety <br />Comprehensive Management Plan as directed by the State. Staff was recommending the revisions <br />and recommending adoption of the proposed ordinance. <br />Mr. DeBlois responded to Commissioner Wheeler’s question on the definition of <br />“not feasible” by giving an example and Commissioner Wheeler’s point was it was based on just <br />economics. <br />September 13, 2005 31 <br /> <br />