My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/13/2005 (2)
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
09/13/2005 (2)
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 2:14:25 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/13/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3095
Book and Page
129, 516-583
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
273
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowden, SECONDED by <br />Commissioner Davis, the Board unanimously approved <br />moving forward to the second public hearing on October 4, <br />2005 to consider declaration of a temporary moratorium on <br />the acceptance of applications for administrative permits <br />and the issuance of administrative permit approvals for <br />“small lot single-family subdivisions”. <br /> <br />9.B. PUBLIC DISCUSSION ITEM – REQUEST TO SPEAK FROM <br />SCOTT SANDERS REGARDING STRUCTURAL OVERHANG <br />REGULATIONS FOR PROPOSED RESIDENCE <br /> <br />th <br />Scott Sanders <br />, 6116 7 Street, advised that he recently submitted an application to <br />build a house on his lot. He has been informed there is a problem with an overhang on easement, <br />but he claimed Section 911(2)(A) clearly provides for it. He also claimed that the house next door <br />was built exactly the same. He understood Engineering had received a memo from the County <br />Attorney that said a new interpretation would not allow the overhang. He cited case law and asked <br />the Board to look with practicality at his request for his 2-story house and the easement. He <br />presented various scenarios of how the easement could be accessed in any emergency. He claimed <br />approval would not be a precedent-setting decision nor will it be a future issue and that it had been <br />allowed in the past. He asked that he not be required to do something that others have not been <br />asked to do and that he be allowed to build his house as designed. <br />Chairman Lowther agreed with Mr. Sanders’ interpretation and Commissioner <br />Neuberger noted that the other house had been allowed. <br />County Attorney Collins reiterated that the eave could overhang into the yard but not <br />into the easement. An easement holder has rights to use their property but if a backhoe should ever <br />September 13, 2005 33 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.