Laserfiche WebLink
Discussion ensued on the types of businesses, the volume of traffic and the <br />different types of vehicles that could be used for both CH and CG. <br /> <br />Bill Mills <br />, Real Estate Management, clarified there has been a traffic study done <br />and he is not sure what type of business will be placed on the property at this time. <br /> <br />Andrew Erickson <br />, on the Board of Directors of Kenwood Village, stated he is not <br />in objection to all of the types of businesses that could be placed on the property but he does not <br />want any business that attracts vagrants, homeless, drug dealers, and drunks. <br /> <br />Jerry Rodan <br />, Kenwood Village, cited he was here to speak as a resident of <br />Kenwood Village and to speak for the people of Kenwood who were not able to attend and <br />object to the rezoning. He asked the Board to deny the rezoning request and suggested the <br />County purchase more park and green space for that area. <br /> <br />Bill Mills <br /> made it clear there would not be a gas station on the property. <br /> <br />Vice Chairman Neuberger remarked that there is not a big difference between the <br />CG and CH land uses. <br /> <br />Beth Mill <br />, Kenwood Village, expressed her concern with noise and light pollution <br />and is not in favor of the rezoning. <br /> <br />Pam Tory <br />, Kenwood Village, was not in favor of the rezoning and felt it would <br />have serious negative effects on the area due to the latitude that is given with CG. <br /> <br />Chris Crawford <br /> felt the zoning would be compatible with the neighborhoods if <br />they were better integrated with one another. <br /> <br />Joe McCalico <br />, Kenwood Village, spoke in opposition to the rezoning and reported <br />his concerns with crime if a less than reputable establishment moves onto the property. <br /> <br />September 6, 2005 25 <br /> <br />