My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09/6/2005
CBCC
>
Meetings
>
2000's
>
2005
>
09/6/2005
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2018 1:58:43 PM
Creation date
10/1/2015 6:00:22 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Type
BCC
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
09/06/2005
Meeting Body
Board of County Commissioners
Archived Roll/Disk#
3032
Book and Page
129, 433-491
Supplemental fields
SmeadsoftID
271
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
50
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The Vice Chairman closed the Public Hearing. <br /> <br />MOTION WAS MADE by Commissioner Wheeler, to <br />deny the rezoning request, SECONDED by Commissioner <br />Bowden. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler believed that any neighborhood wherever possible should <br />have the right to decide who they want for neighbors within reason. <br /> <br />County Attorney William Collins clarified that the property could be deed <br />restricted. Deed restriction is not something the Board can compel but is an avenue the property <br />owner could impose on his own property to try and get some support from the neighborhood. <br /> <br />Mr. Mills <br />would not limit anyone on their property use. He commented that the <br />County sets the lighting standards in CH and CG and stressed there will not be a fast-food <br />restaurant or a gas station on the property. <br /> <br />Director Keating stated there is one alternative that would involve the applicant <br />filing for a Planned Development (PD) because PDs are allowed in commercial zoning. If the <br />applicant chooses, he could design his product and the adjacent residents could see the plan and <br />that plan would be the limitation of what could go on the property. <br /> <br />Discussion ensued and it was discovered that if the proposed rezoning was denied, <br />the applicant would be precluded for a year from coming back with another rezoning request on <br />the proposed property. <br /> <br />Commissioner Wheeler WITHDREW his motion and <br />Commissioner Bowden WITHDREW her second. <br /> <br />ON MOTION by Commissioner Bowden, SECONDED <br />by Commissioner Wheeler, the Board unanimously <br />September 6, 2005 26 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.